Message-Id: <199702250002.TAA10317@adams.berk.net>
From: "James Fudge" <jfudge AT adams DOT berk DOT net>
To: <pfortran AT crl DOT com>, "Bruce Morgen" <editor AT juno DOT com>
Cc: <rmh AT interlaced DOT net>, <opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net>
Subject: Re: [opendos] BAD Filesystems
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 1997 18:58:41 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net
Precedence: bulk



----------
> From: Bruce Morgen <editor AT juno DOT com>
> To: pfortran AT crl DOT com
> Cc: rmh AT interlaced DOT net; opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net
> Subject: Re: [opendos] BAD Filesystems
> >>> >> While we are there, why not make bash the default command 
> >interpreter for
> >>> >> OpenDOS?  (Can we add this to the wish list?)
> > 
> >>> >Why not just use Linux?:)
> > 
> >>> Sure - make it run on the 286 in my garage currently running 
> >OpenDOS.
> >
> >>Minix is now free.
> >
> >What does that have to do with Linux? Or OpenDOS? :)
> >
> Not a helluvalot, but it doe usefully 
> point out a workable, non-DOS alternative 
> for pre-386 PCs -- with a bit of effort, 
> Minix will even run on an XT clone

if wanna use bash i'll use linux or win95

not that bash is bad... 

as for minix - it was the very first file system for linux was it not 

i think it it relevant to those that design file systems for operating
systems

having said a bunch of nothingness, 

i digress

;)

James Fudge