Message-ID: <19970215183721.55934@hagbard.demon.co.uk> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 1997 18:37:21 +0000 From: Dave Pearson To: opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net Subject: Re: ~OD: Re: [opendos] [OpenDOS] Wishlist part 2 References: <19970214183356 DOT 63660 AT hagbard DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Hagbard's World In-Reply-To: ; from mharris@blackwidow.saultc.on.ca on Feb 02, 1997 at 05:39:57AM -0500 Sender: owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net Precedence: bulk On Feb 02, 1997 at 05:39:57AM -0500, mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca wrote: > On Fri, 14 Feb 1997, Dave Pearson wrote: > > > [Hmm, I wonder what could be done about building support for the extended > > wildcard system at the findfirst()/findnext() level inside OD itself....] > > Wouldn't THAT be nice! One problem though. The characters that > are used in extended wildcards wouldn't be available as filename > characters. ie: '[' and ']' Or are they not allready? Hmmm. That's a bloody good point, I didn't think about that. Well, I didn't think it thru that much at all, it was more a 'I wonder'. Still, it would be kind of cool. -- Take a look in Hagbard's World: | w3ng - The WWW Norton Guide reader. http://www.acemake.com/hagbard | ng2html - The NG to HTML converter. Also available in the UK: | eg - Norton Guide reader for OS/2. http://www.hagbard.demon.co.uk | dgscan - DGROUP scanner for Clipper.