From: mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca Date: Sat, 15 Feb 1997 08:59:30 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca To: Weiqi Gao cc: opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net Subject: Re: [opendos] BAD Filesystems In-Reply-To: <199702151304.AA13022@mail.crl.com> Message-ID: Organization: Total disorganization. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net Precedence: bulk On Sat, 15 Feb 1997, Weiqi Gao wrote: > >Looks like we're going to need to borrow another idea from Linux. > >That is the FSSTND. Anyone care to make a DOS FSSTND? > > Why reinvent the wheel? Why not just USE the Linux File System Standard? > (We are going to use ext2fs any way, right?) Well, I figured if I said that we should USE the Linux FSSTND that a bunch of people would say "Why not just use Linux", and I am, and that isn't the point. The point being that a standard should be made so that software can expect things in certain places. The Linux FSSTND is a good candidate because it allready exists, would facilitate porting from DOS -> Linux or the other way around, it would eliminate the need for 10000 environment variables or CONFIG.SYS or OPENDOS.INI entries. So now that you brought it up, I'll back it up by casting my vote with yours. Lets bring the Linux FSSTND to DOS. (Added to wishlist.) > While we are there, why not make bash the default command interpreter for > OpenDOS? (Can we add this to the wish list?) I don't know about "the default", but if someone wants to use bash, they can download the DOS port of it from the DJGPP archive site. Caldera could of course put it on any CD's that they ship too. Mike A. Harris | http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris Computer Consultant | My webpage has moved and my address has changed. My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html mailto:mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca Linux: The OS with a cool FSSTND that doesnt use environment variables