From: mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 08:54:03 -0500 (EST)
Reply-To: mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca
To: "Colin W. Glenn" <cwg01 AT gnofn DOT org>
cc: "'OpenDOS newsgroup'" <opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net>
Subject: Re: [opendos] 7k mouse driver
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970207210828.21429B-100000@sparkie.gnofn.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970210085234.285p-100000@capslock.com>
Organization: Total disorganization.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 7 Feb 1997, Colin W. Glenn wrote:

> On Fri, 7 Feb 1997, MORRIS JP wrote:
> >  [snip]
> [prune]
> 
> > > C or ASM is fine.  I personally would prefer that DOS code is
> > > written in ASM as much as possible though.  Reason: SIZE!!!!!  I
> 
> IF the driver is compiled by a Good Compiler, it leaves a tiny footprint.
IF the driver is written in 100% ASM by a good programmer, it
leaves a smaller footprint.

> > Hope that's useful, and hope there isn't a huge mouse driver thread coming..
> Eeek!  There's a mouse in my filesystems thread!
Yip, definately.  I can see it coming.  Thats ok, I'm prepared...
:o)


Mike A. Harris        |             http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris
Computer Consultant   |    My webpage has moved and my address has changed.
My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html
mailto:mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca

RHIDE: Current version 1.10