From: mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 23:48:18 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca To: "Colin W. Glenn" cc: dg AT dcs DOT st-and DOT ac DOT uk, opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net Subject: Re: [opendos] OpenDOS + Win95 w/FAT32 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Organization: Total disorganization. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net Precedence: bulk On Mon, 3 Feb 1997, Colin W. Glenn wrote: > On Mon, 3 Feb 1997 dg AT dcs DOT st-and DOT ac DOT uk wrote: > > > >Have you folks thought about giving the inode number to 8.3 filenames? > > Okay, so you download some documentation and save it: > > Now you want to browse it with your favourite file viewer. This isn't LFN > > Now, which one was the tutorial? Ummmm... > > A better solution is to use some sort of hashing. For example, the above under > > but GEOS doesn't use them. I hate to say this, but the Win95 way: > > Ok, we're getting somewhere now, what you would need is a popup utility > which would let you 'browse' the inode numbers and see what the names > really are, something like a pig95 open dialog. (sorry) Again, we get into the issue of non-interactive usage and graphical applications that are unaware of the LFN's. Mike A. Harris | http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris Computer Consultant | My webpage has moved and my address has changed. My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html mailto:mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca Xwindows: Forget '95. Use a REAL GUI.