Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 17:05:47 -0500 (EST)
From: "...Nissim..." <nchudnof AT mbhs DOT edu>
To: Mark Habersack <grendel AT ananke DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
cc: "Ian 'DrDebug' Day" <Ian AT darkblak DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>,
        OpenDOS Mailing List <opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net>
Subject: Re: [opendos] OpenDOS + Win95 w/FAT32?
In-Reply-To: <199702040034.BAA14920@math.amu.edu.pl>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970204170437.31441A-100000@binx.mbhs.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 4 Feb 1997, Mark Habersack wrote:

> Once upon a time (on  2 Feb 97 at 17:19) Ian 'DrDebug' Day said:
> 
> > look too hard, now, does it? Come on, someone could write a TSR >that
> > implements it on top of FAT, either as VFAT or using look-up files >without
> > much difficulty.
> > 
> > TSR?  Are you on drugs?  It would be far better if we were to compile
> > the components that you want into IBMDOS.SYS (or whatever).  This would
> > provide the fastest system possible.
> Nope. IBMDOS.COM should be kept as small as possible, and how do you imagine 
> adding up new file systems? Recompile IBMDOS.COM every time!?
> 
> > And perhaps also go along the lines of Linux and have loadable modules
> > (a bit like VLMs).
> Now, that's the way to go! But, once again, we have to develop a standard for 
> these drivers.
Don't think it's ever gonna happen (soon at least (I mean the stuff you
want)), but djgpp has the DXE stuff, and someone wrote a DLM library too.