To: opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net
Subject: Re: [opendos] OpenDOS + Win95 w/FAT32? 
Message-ID: <19970203.183342.4575.0.chambersb@juno.com>
References: <199702020421 DOT XAA26504 AT keeper DOT albany DOT net>
From: chambersb AT juno DOT com (Benjamin D Chambers)
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 1997 21:32:43 EST
Sender: owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net
Precedence: bulk


On Sun, 2 Feb 1997 20:39:40 +0100 "Mark Habersack"
<grendel AT ananke DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl> writes:
>Once upon a time (on  2 Feb 97 at 0:18) jdashiel AT eagle1 DOT eaglenet DOT com 
>said:
>
>> Why not make the fat 32 an I.F.S?  Then this way if it's
>> supplied users can decide which way they'd like to go.
>Coz there's no documentation of IFS interface. Besides it's an M$ 
>standard 
>and, as such, is being kept secret ;-)). I'd vote for developing an 
>OpenDOS-specific format of such an installable FS driver (and one that 
>can be 
>dynamically loaded/unloaded without all that black magic needed to 
>remove an 
>installed SYS driver on DOS)
You mean... DOG LET'S YOU REMOVE A .SYS DRIVER??????
Who'd of guessed???  I thought M$'s policy was "It worked for you
yesterday - if you don't want it there anymore/it's not working anymore,
then YOU're the one that has a bug, cause OUR stuff is great!"

...Chambers