Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 14:48:22 -0800 (PST)
From: Gene Buckle <geneb AT web DOT wa DOT net>
To: Takashi Toyooka <ttoyooka AT verisim DOT com>
cc: opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net
Subject: Re: [opendos] License Agreement again
In-Reply-To: <1.5.4.16.19970203224208.354fb634@pop.verisim.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.970203144717.9374A-100000@web.wa.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net
Precedence: bulk


> I hope I don't sound whiny or nitpicky, but the license agreement on
> the new download page looks the same as the one before.  Can anyone
> confirm that our concerns (about modifying OpenDOS) are being heard
> and addressed?  Or, is this release another source-less release?
> 
> Or, are we misinterpreting the agreement?  Oh - I suppose I should
> speak only for myself - am *I* misinterpreting the agreement?
> 

There is no source with this release.  I'm not done with it yet. ;)

I've voiced concerns to Roger about the current state of the agreement.  I
would imagine that if this one is not changed, the source agreement will
be far looser in scope than the binary agreement.

g.