Message-ID: Date: Sun, 2 Feb 1997 17:19:38 +0000 To: opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net From: "Ian 'DrDebug' Day" Subject: Re: [opendos] OpenDOS + Win95 w/FAT32? In-Reply-To: <30177.9702021617@dufftown.dcs.st-andrews.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net Precedence: bulk In article <30177 DOT 9702021617 AT dufftown DOT dcs DOT st-andrews DOT ac DOT uk>, dg AT dcs DOT st- and.ac.uk writes >The main thing that needs done, though, is the long filenames interface. From >Ralf Brown's interrupt list: > > MS-DOS 7 (Chicago) - LONG FILENAME FUNCTIONS > > AH = 71h > AL = function > 0Dh reset drive > 39h create directory > 3Ah remove directory > 3Bh set current directory > 41h delete file > 43h get file attributes (BL=00h), set file attributes (BL=01h) > 47h get current directory > 4Eh find first file > 4Fh find next file > 56h move (rename) file > 6Ch create/open file > >This doesn't look too hard, now, does it? Come on, someone could write a TSR >that implements it on top of FAT, either as VFAT or using look-up files >without much difficulty. TSR? Are you on drugs? It would be far better if we were to compile the components that you want into IBMDOS.SYS (or whatever). This would provide the fastest system possible. And perhaps also go along the lines of Linux and have loadable modules (a bit like VLMs). DrDebug --------------------------------------------------------------------- Ian 'DrDebug' Day | Email: Ian AT darkblak DOT demon DOT co DOT uk Dark Black Software Ltd. | WWW: http://www.darkblak.demon.co.uk The Home of MrDebug | Dark Knight BBS & Fax: +44 (0)1480 471465 (THE Clipper debugger) | Tel: +44 (0)1480 403104 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Turnpike evaluation. For Turnpike information, mailto:info AT turnpike DOT com