Date: Sun, 2 Feb 1997 18:56:51 -0600 (CST)
From: "Colin W. Glenn" <cwg01 AT gnofn DOT org>
To: Mark Habersack <grendel AT ananke DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
cc: mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca, dg AT dcs DOT st-and DOT ac DOT uk,
        OpenDOS Mailing List <opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net>
Subject: Re: [opendos] OpenDOS + Win95 w/FAT32? 
In-Reply-To: <199702022233.XAA29456@math.amu.edu.pl>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970202185220.28922D-100000@sparkie.gnofn.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 2 Feb 1997, Mark Habersack wrote:
> Once upon a time (on  2 Feb 97 at 9:35) mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on. said:
> Can you see any other possibility? ;-) When we have the sources, nothin' can 
> stop us. The only thing that worries me is the mess that may result from that 
> if everything is not well coordinated. I mean we should know *exactly* on 
> what do Caldera programmers work, what is scheduled for the nearest future, 
> what is available for volunteers etc.

I would think that once they've released the sources, there will be
extensive support for those rewriting them, as well as provision for
submitting modified source for approval to be distributed.  In better
words, Caldera maintains control over the improvement process, preventing
ten thousand different OpenDOS's from sprouting like wild grass.