Message-Id: <199702022234.XAA07978@math.amu.edu.pl>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <grendel AT ananke DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
From: "Mark Habersack" <grendel AT ananke DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
Organization: What? (Poznan, Poland)
To: mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 1997 20:39:42 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: [opendos] OpenDOS + Win95 w/FAT32? 
Reply-to: grendel AT ananke DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl
CC: jamesl AT albany DOT net, OpenDOS Mailing List <opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net>
References: <Pine DOT NXT DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 970202001730 DOT 27399C-100000 AT eagle1>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970202100233.5878Y-100000@capslock.com>
Sender: owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net
Precedence: bulk

Once upon a time (on  2 Feb 97 at 10:03) mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on. said:

> > Why not make the fat 32 an I.F.S?  Then this way if it's
> > supplied users can decide which way they'd like to go.
> 
> That's what I've been saying all along!  Which brings up the point:
> 
> Is anyone currently working on an IFS for DOS?
How?! Show me the specs and I will write it!

****************************************************************
You ask for my love on a strength of a kiss,
But can't you just play for experience?
I'm a poet, I'm a minstral, I don't need your chains
Romance lies in ruin, let debauch you bewail, let it rain...
---
Visit http://ananke.amu.edu.pl/~grendel