Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970119195330.0069f9e4@mail.wa.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 1997 19:53:36 -0800
To: root <root AT capslock DOT com>
From: Gene Buckle <geneb AT deltasoft DOT com>
Subject: Re: [opendos] First time...
Cc: grendel AT ananke DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl, OpenDOS Mailing List <opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net>,
        geneb AT wa DOT net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net
Precedence: bulk

>> >> I'll look into newgrouping these:
>> >> 
>> >> comp.os.opendos.advocacy
>> >> comp.os.opendos.bugs
>> >> comp.os.opendos.developer
>> >> comp.os.opendos.gui
>> >> comp.os.opendos.misc
>> >> comp.os.opendos.programming.djgpp
>> >> comp.os.opendos.programming.drivers
>> >> comp.os.opendos.programming.multitasking
>> >
>> >comp.os.opendos.programming.customapi /* For API specific for OpenDOS */
>> >comp.os.opendos.compatibility
>
>YUKK!!!!  The S/N ratio of ANY group in alt.* is about 1/1000000.  I like
>the comp.os.* idea better myself.  Also, even if it were started in the
>alt heirarchy, when switched to comp a year from now we'd all see the "I'm
>not switching and you cant make me" posts.  Blah!!!!!
>

Good point Mike.  I should be able to get them newgroup'd this week after I
do a bit of research.  I need to make sure that they're done in a valid
fashion so that they'll be available to everyone instead of just those
using my news server.

This brings up another point.  Should I create them as moderated?  If so,
who wants to do the moderating?

g.