From: "Don Walker" To: Subject: RE: new eda tools Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 13:02:19 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: <200208261752.g7QHqJZ15227@envy.delorie.com> Reply-To: hobbyplat AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: hobbyplat AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Cool, it's been a while since I looked at it and for some reason I was thinking it only did two layers. DonW... > -----Original Message----- > From: DJ Delorie [mailto:dj AT delorie DOT com] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:52 PM > To: hobbyplat AT delorie DOT com > Subject: Re: new eda tools > > > > > To achieve the form factor we were talking about we were estimating > > a 6 to 8 layer board. > > PCB supports 8 layer boards. If you need more, edit globalconst.h and > #define it to a higher value. MUCS defaults to allowing up to 16 > layers. If you have a specific concern, I'll look at the sources and > see what's up and if it can be fixed. And yes, I *know* the libraries > all stink, but building new ones from scratch for the specific > components we use won't be difficult. > > I looked at Eagle but I didn't feel like spending $3000 to get all the > features you'd need to do "everything" (complex boards with > autorouting). And I wasn't impressed when I found that their RS232 > footprints were on 100 mil centers instead of 108 like they're > supposed to be.