X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Qsdox99KcRetJr/efO68f33dVMczgdorD8ivUtm8jp4=; b=mBuz0iCHlEwzTAHqu+pp6OryFbd6D2UF07H6IprKxldCePMN4N9mLU9deOmqpFzUB+ NwQWV29esajHMtbaCo3wJyJN9J2uDipz6Wi2p/349UngOBp1kc4WX46JFzrMLcn3vRc9 rp1s0pPIbBzmPCINABLNrczO88M7BIzSHbUeoNOumDxPtZt8IdU8rI5U4xaPEOfXR6VZ 9bAhGxpz8UjLG3FFD+Y7BAqnsh3v45JeCbellw+z1OsLWCYO2hxMoc9N/MlJ6XrOh/SR dju0K0UNlXuzi4d5C2ioE6rSduOFOzPV18TIHLkZUXZB2+FAHthzgSk+lfVAL6oXmyro 5vAQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Qsdox99KcRetJr/efO68f33dVMczgdorD8ivUtm8jp4=; b=Ji0+6nF5AoxAmJlS98iJrT/VE4QHxRgdeNofZrIAa3coYzlqPj6PcE4AqL3JuOz3cy oS+gTof2uJ0S1gCdsT/HWF0ncR5ZFsvcuS2kKDHixOq8FGBpeiQ72RYDN8/jo8dr7O9e ZRylqI/l+ASulAFaQSeB9eKRJrLQBj9NjG6esLZIY9MiGOK8il6OGQJIXvcFndQ/Czxf 4smuTdSVLXn/sUKQ3SZJsIIj3NqMTZNC/EG9gBcAb/iGaex44z35yg7KTDKZhbFWpWEd 8vvNn3qdytUr/OclEDSCqVk1Pae63WmSmsx/RKLJtUC4Oi1B9srb01uh6fA3dpAPykwg Lhdw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53040MXl7Drl2DSuL4v8zhor+aS0W6wN3r3rLkIK1Khkv8guDZx/ Og84SlZL+OrT7GcKhP4n4LEmI38Q3wI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxmiapaJIgeoywor2tyIvD6IlkUqb6BMgf+3CJHfeMzdxHN8d2hMl2cTXx2OePLN7NOFn9tXA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:c04:: with SMTP id z4mr14186247lfu.156.1618871070632; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 15:24:30 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" X-Google-Original-From: Vladimir Zhbanov Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 01:24:29 +0300 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] lepton-schematic configuration Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <17a2b20c-5100-7084-b3e5-da83b4c7cc31 AT wavecable DOT com> <20210416171019 DOT AB0F783D2748 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <45fc224d-86ac-d9e7-e0c0-045f88ff3c39 AT wavecable DOT com> <20210417120802 DOT AC8E5824EA9F AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20210417150846 DOT D71A7824EAA0 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210417150846.D71A7824EAA0@turkos.aspodata.se> Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Karl, On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 05:08:46PM +0200, karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: ... > > It's a shame that geda moved other way around having all means > > and whose interpreter just _reads_ sexps natively.) > ... > > Wasn't that about not risking evildoing commands in files inported > from elsewhere. It would be nice have a crippled (a mean safe) > interpreter for such cases, like gs -dSAFER, perl taint, openocd > jimtcl, debian fakeroot (in a way), etc. > > Is there any such thing for scheme ? > It could possible be a preload lib, removing "for config files > unsafe syscalls". > > If we had that, the rationale for the ini files wouldn't hold any > more. Sorry for delay. Do you mean something like this? https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Sandboxed-Evaluation.html Well, there are simpler ways. For example, we could just use a declarative style of config in Scheme instead of executable rc commands like Guix does. Vladimir