X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 15:22:35 +0100 (CET)
From: Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org>
To: "John Griessen (john AT ecosensory DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Is gschem 1.9.2 (gb83e7a3) the latest version?
In-Reply-To: <8bcb2348-bfa1-6faf-f637-d91ccc670776@ecosensory.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711291500490.2581@nimbus>
References: <8bcb2348-bfa1-6faf-f637-d91ccc670776 AT ecosensory DOT com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, John Griessen (john AT ecosensory DOT com) [via 
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> Compile directions I can find seem a little old...  Are the recent 
> updates to gnetlist alone, or gschem also?

Unfortunately, the situation didn't change since May:
http://www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi?p=geda-user/2017/05/04/14:44:28

Right now, I believe that getting out a new revision is important enough 
to justify moving the half-finished features to a topic branch.  It has 
become evident that they aren't going to be finished any time soon, so I'd 
rather revert to the old behavior than postpone the next release 
indefinitely or ship inconsistent code.