X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Ironport-SBRS: None X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2FaBQADvs9W/52AA4BegzpSg1a5ShmFawkCgUY8EAEBAQEBAQEDYSeCNzg8AQEBAQEBIwIpQwEBBDpPCxgJExIPBYh7Bb0VAQEBBwIBGQSGEoQ6hQGCX4EPBY4eiGqFWId+gVIVhESIUo5JNyuEBRuIRgEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,498,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="14744875" Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:38:56 -0800 From: Larry Doolittle To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Re: re-instituting GetXY() Message-ID: <20160226023856.GB1411@recycle.lbl.gov> References: <201602260114 DOT u1Q1EFRk019336 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201602260114.u1Q1EFRk019336@envy.delorie.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk DJ - On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 08:14:15PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: > They work in some indirect way you don't understand, but it's very > indirect so no blame there, and probably should be fixed. Obligatory xkcd: https://xkcd.com/1172/ Please don't take it seriously. - Larry