X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 16:45:55 -0500 Message-Id: <201601282145.u0SLjtD5003045@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com CC: geda-user AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: (geda-user AT delorie DOT com) Subject: Re: [geda-user] The nature of gEDA layers References: <201601261804 DOT u0QI4KEQ009550 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20160126233332 DOT dec2f06f5c74354a3841989c AT gmail DOT com> <20160127091746 DOT 1c7a976c2752f913921688ac AT gmail DOT com> <20160127141334 DOT c738feb9dbeb54a7dec3dff8 AT gmail DOT com> <56A8F74B DOT 8080304 AT ecosensory DOT com> <56A961BC DOT 3040405 AT ecosensory DOT com> <56A9E416 DOT 8080500 AT ecosensory DOT com> Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com > > - pad stacks, with differnet pad sizes on middle layers > > Everyone seems to want these, to be honest I don't understand what > pads on middle layers are for. Not mounting components for sure. If > it's just a node what's wrong with a trace or poly? Internal pads provide structural integrity to the hole plating. However, the alignment accuracy for internal pads is not the same as for external pads, so the DRC rules are different, but OTOH you sometimes want big outer pads for strength but smaller inner pads to allow more traces between pins. Etc. > > - hierarchical layout > > It can be done now... PCB doesn't support it, you need to flatten the design first, and using external scripts (which I've done) to replicate the design is just hacks. > I've never done these. I guess the flexing connector layer is on > top, but only where it exists so you can still have components on > the layer below? There's still only one top layer at any given > point? It depends - there's lots of options for how flex assemblies are put together. There might, indeed, be multiple "top" layers for one X,Y coordinate.