X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=IXIyTsbRW6Vk1CDjpWnAgSV/m1ntzR+/ibFNrHmIH7g=; b=O9CwjC5BmvJFtLjFHdOCNVKdDWbLLF1lyUC1QMAB+ZNHDxP19Ub6DKyKVaI2hl3deb OyIQNjgOgf/MxllrRqFF5caNaalPnAdyGFJfk9GCnPbR4cgKgQhizIVszJYEhdnxcgqq AaheymJJeUqOHMSbew8/WOEit1uV/EMTV+0jcNS40LlWxHRy7sCniHflIZXGtmzwkL7R FaIFr8Kdo5bu3zDQiYgKcyIsWZ3EaF/srqw0bdockBb2L2X1wfX6WbiyFNAzIRr+6lR8 0iWpmi0JN9Sda+2quh66Zg88gEQzf6ozRBOIE9I3icLhfw5wf5bQTJPtzZA19gY8BwrS VPMw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=IXIyTsbRW6Vk1CDjpWnAgSV/m1ntzR+/ibFNrHmIH7g=; b=DoRunZKu/nRbox+muf/N7DbkYQqHouwd+mXpvl+5t3n2puhzkDBxzN+Mc9zX2A8T2y FVo+T1B930THm9+sf7oYEtAck9fYlw/vfKJDTkD+OGqQ1KcNdZWjqsMiqsoEp9hkwyXX oXZ23ymKm6xP4EoqkEVcdi2c03u34E6gwJq8skMVqlikMCxKhEfOvtEyHuiJWSwtqUR2 RaI3uJ2P8554qGDRqFCJCNFBu8w0wzI1z+bIzcxq4oq2a6enp/OTQN5tkZ+ACSzwh9Wg Ib+ha7/q8X0A/nHF1EMgbgzZQy8fKtDkoa8utpisshKOv0UJ3xbtiRkGzK3nQ6EVZ81q ln+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQldcOGKdgKuzocm6+Q1637nl90dsuMTHkZq8Q0e0h5opiNw4bv3D8G3jcIDOJotXi/uDGkCdS0gWvSv8oTQGGwYkfLu2A== X-Received: by 10.25.64.5 with SMTP id n5mr15915163lfa.89.1453401650699; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 10:40:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 21:40:48 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] should we broaden scope of libgeda Message-ID: <20160121184048.GD4788@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <20160102091556 DOT BBC6D809D79B AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20160102131252 DOT F383A809D79A AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20160121144142 DOT 2703D81053E4 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20160121161958 DOT GB4788 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20160121174016 DOT E995881053E3 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160121174016.E995881053E3@turkos.aspodata.se> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 06:40:16PM +0100, karl AT aspodata DOT se wrote: > Vladimir: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 03:41:42PM +0100, karl AT aspodata DOT se wrote: > ... > > > http://archives.seul.org/geda/user/May-2011/msg00556.html > ... > > Karl, please, no. Don't compare static C string "CVS" compiled in the > > code of the program, which you've proposed, with the hi-level Scheme > > function taking any argument. Peter Brett, IIUC, has apparently meant > > this. > > Apparantly you didn't read the followups. And re. "CVS" that could be > fixed, don't expect first version to be perfect. I've read all them now (before, I read only first two followups) and found nothing different that could change my opinion on that. > > ... > > You see, the function 'file-name-separator-string' doesn't work. It's > > a stock guile 2.0 function. What's your version of guile? And what's > > your version of geda-gaf? > ... > > $ guile --version > Guile 1.8.8 > > Ok, damn it. Another project is using 1.8... OK, I understand. I've already mentioned this link: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Parallel-Installations.html although I don't know if the recipe will work for you if your geda-gaf version is not 1.9.2 where I've dropped the guile 1.8 compatibility. Cheers, Vladimir