X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=i4JfE7+xdl6IgKSYrbc9bTjZxu6LYOeDOT1ql0KheyU=;
        b=C5RQAMIirKNOFnMKraw12jonDpmX0dveoMGaTepNMJB9XcJu0z1Dhav/bcaVbr6isr
         qYFN7H+6VZd0p03DnJZOb70/cHTBvyNXcsi07aJFhSFJOlQwQ5mgLCN93spbpnkLWYU2
         MzGDpSuKym9l2gKydaRb6bRTBEOgkvJAF3k4Odgzb1Mu6eU3wKMD8b2Mg54h6g1c6Oea
         hyWr5/L57PQPKO/0Pox4H/Xoqcgk+ZAE20YXhpfpO260SddSF6gANy2oiFHfdhEogWjo
         7j+sZ9IM7Yx5JrworSJKHDNoMCqwGfTFwjjoSvSiip2K3jCHJuovaNMu4YxZW0Ki2Tm2
         9OQg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.43.161 with SMTP id x1mr22498358igl.64.1445941222649;
 Tue, 27 Oct 2015 03:20:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1510271032140.7137@igor2priv>
References: <CAC4O8c_0jg9_VbT82H3P7uNi90zg=7O1Bya3ZwPW1MybP-yO9Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CACwWb3CcWkRz9Wnz+tFKTc+PkP8sZEEJ8kJX=08gM28P4RrE7w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1510271032140 DOT 7137 AT igor2priv>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:20:22 +0100
Message-ID: <CACwWb3Cwwe1kVwH62QOgg1yz7xwOfjW6mdiuikDJ9_iNr+8PAw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] home/bkerin/geometry_module branch
From: "Levente (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: gEDA User Mailing List <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0111bffef134f10523136cb3
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

--089e0111bffef134f10523136cb3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I remember there was a movement to transform PCB to C++. I guess DJ made
PCB ready to be compiled by a C++ compiler. DJ?

Personally, I don't like C++, but I think C++ is a better tool to code a
PCB editor application than C.

Lev

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:36 AM, <gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Levente (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>
> Okay, I don't want to start another war here. I was browsing the manual of
>> the CGAL library, and I think it has some nice features that can bring lot
>> of benefit for us. So I'd go for CGAL.
>>
>> Just my two cents.
>>
>
> I don't want to join another war here either, but CGAL is not all benefit
> but has a cost as well. Sloccount on include/ in CGAL says 578k lines of
> code. It's more than 5 times bigger than the whole PCB src/, including the
> hids and everything. And it's all C++, while PCB code that needs these
> calculations are mostly in C.
>
>
>
>
>
>

--089e0111bffef134f10523136cb3
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">I remember there was a movement to transform PCB to C++. I=
 guess DJ made PCB ready to be compiled by a C++ compiler. DJ?<br><div><br>=
</div><div>Personally, I don&#39;t like C++, but I think C++ is a better to=
ol to code a PCB editor application than C.<br><br></div><div>Lev<br></div>=
</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct=
 27, 2015 at 10:36 AM,  <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:gedau AT igor2=
.repo.hu" target=3D"_blank">gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><b=
lockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px =
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D""><br>
<br>
On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Levente (<a href=3D"mailto:leventelist AT gmail DOT com" targ=
et=3D"_blank">leventelist AT gmail DOT com</a>) [via <a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT d=
elorie.com" target=3D"_blank">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>] wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Okay, I don&#39;t want to start another war here. I was browsing the manual=
 of<br>
the CGAL library, and I think it has some nice features that can bring lot<=
br>
of benefit for us. So I&#39;d go for CGAL.<br>
<br>
Just my two cents.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></span>
I don&#39;t want to join another war here either, but CGAL is not all benef=
it but has a cost as well. Sloccount on include/ in CGAL says 578k lines of=
 code. It&#39;s more than 5 times bigger than the whole PCB src/, including=
 the hids and everything. And it&#39;s all C++, while PCB code that needs t=
hese calculations are mostly in C.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>

--089e0111bffef134f10523136cb3--