X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at neurotica.com X-NSA-prism-xkeyscore: I do not consent to surveillance, prick X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=neurotica.com; s=default; t=1445728192; bh=p2Xaumkrka4a/gHkJxpYKMpy6OaxFhfBSwf/vjr2fYk=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=YZ2lbrdjoZyY4hwJ7t6iu6kLI+jnW7HnIvXISwM+E8hHJ45qxupY8Y2Cz1i+XABXZ fLev7KmGdGKn2nJRkrOh/McN5MrJrUncHt03dV9L9t0OXgqF280/MXMAICqz01uBAg qFs9d3bxAeEi2T7z8W3ZzKRj+8t1fvpKBjkrC3RU= Subject: Re: [geda-user] Stable and low noise references To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <201510162117 DOT 12255 DOT ad252 AT freeelectron DOT net> <20151023070213 DOT GA19358 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> <20151023212815 DOT GA31581 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> <20151024225457 DOT GA25400 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> From: "Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Message-ID: <562C0FBF.2050604@neurotica.com> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 19:09:51 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151024225457.GA25400@visitor2.iram.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On 10/24/2015 06:54 PM, Gabriel Paubert (paubert AT iram DOT es) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >>> This is becoming offtopic, but the LTZ1000A is, to my knowledge, still >>> the best reference available in terms of noise and long term stability, >>> and until a few years ago, I only used buried Zener references when I >>> needed high stability. >> >> It is. If you look at any of the tear downs people do of meters above >> 6 digits they are all using that reference or one made by LT custom >> for Fluke. > > I was not aware of that, but this means that this device has cornered a > market from people accepting to pay for the performance and might not be > EOLed too quickly. This is very much an LT thing. I think I can count the number of parts they've EOLed, ever, on one hand. Maybe two, but not by much. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA