X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BdwPZ/mtM+Lpj+G4hnxlc9FzHJG0k7upobXKYqTLF14=; b=Lqqmw1Lgt5mcrzWhsx3WjuF6qaOdGOHyfZ0iJvllufem6NIp7hkm7bHH34YkDxc7w+ dd6gehDGsgLE0tnv3Ql6K+N2uCvjvtHbnYoMy9tBGdxusvgK+VGUmgmUm9r21Wsx3p7O RVOuJlxwdTxhuMKHhSP+VZPpLZpYFdXOGxUKb1ufm6nalto1snrRqlvpSuRBNJDbyzvP AsGxAz0vRTFjvzB9+6NHI9pXiRhBIXr75H6TIgEVHVRIPM/OFM2kzvM5/Jj+QXn3UtH2 /LYwhLnubH0mGf28ZDSTHta7l7v0HcnIl7IxjeFYso0lzzOw/+4NxltL2iZZIQZ8+paI cMmA== X-Received: by 10.194.104.104 with SMTP id gd8mr16714176wjb.126.1445519883083; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 06:18:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 15:17:58 +0200 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] A lesson from gnet-makefile Message-Id: <20151022151758.20940ae1d0e4ca1a3ae37c21@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1042003D-82E2-40F0-AB60-8186580C46AD AT noqsi DOT com> <34B17816-9EA5-45FD-BFB4-9D623A8D3D87 AT noqsi DOT com> <201510210954 DOT 46552 DOT ad252 AT freeelectron DOT net> <73ED29DA-968B-4675-9B00-125E03683C9B AT noqsi DOT com> <201510220112 DOT t9M1Ccfq013731 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201510220136 DOT t9M1a5Uw015222 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20151022090310 DOT d3dc512da6760471f9777706 AT gmail DOT com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 09:00:51 -0400 "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:03 AM, Nicklas Karlsson > (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] > wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:36 AM, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> > > >> >> Would you really do it that way or would you have two different nets > >> >> that meet in a specific way? > >> > > >> > It's amazing how "obvious" it is to just put in an AGND and a DGND > >> > symbol and connect them together... > >> > >> I can't tell if you like this idea or are mocking it. Disadvantage of email. > >> Ether way mixing the two netnames one schematic would enable a lot of > >> ambiguity about where the two meet. Typically when I two grounds and > >> they are connected it is in a very controlled way. > > > > Symbolically it could be deon with an n pin zero ohm resistor or other symbol. In layout a special footprint with one connection point could do the trick. > > That is visually misleading. It should just be lines meeting at a dot. Yes you are right, it will be better. Nicklas Karlsson