X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5xY7eeBGspHvTraS7nJ7pNGYmQYbzdmNQlrI1skxSLA=; b=Pe7KkLj3YZN92UDK5Q3N+JVXhT/3PdWGAp3fqUqJwH1ixrKNQNaKSMcJHEU/Lmyhr2 6u+Ai9s0M8v+QML0RtsrUD3vkqy7YBRJNRxXAb4R71gJsgg2UKVhNK9IXijcYEjWhnJJ HjIsL1Y0jkAGg7TbvIV2hNk+nKZJ7MtPCoWYHkr/0nF/fyPSu4owA2DCA8XyGSowFZk1 P/yu3YJ1yPprcdu5jP84g8YySZ+ib15baU8nnVfhmD/wqSAvw7jcqfGUU46/43AJl3MX sCUd6G+xPwjtAY+nVQVAHgTzVVONZG/mHYe/ZGyDwAsBZgi6+frnUc7zhc8twnNTxhBP A0Xg== X-Received: by 10.180.216.36 with SMTP id on4mr15716395wic.65.1445497218368; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 00:00:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 09:00:16 +0200 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] A lesson from gnet-makefile Message-Id: <20151022090016.744ca48c59796867c527977e@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201510220136.t9M1a5Uw015222@envy.delorie.com> References: <1042003D-82E2-40F0-AB60-8186580C46AD AT noqsi DOT com> <34B17816-9EA5-45FD-BFB4-9D623A8D3D87 AT noqsi DOT com> <201510210954 DOT 46552 DOT ad252 AT freeelectron DOT net> <73ED29DA-968B-4675-9B00-125E03683C9B AT noqsi DOT com> <201510220112 DOT t9M1Ccfq013731 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201510220136 DOT t9M1a5Uw015222 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > > Would you really do it that way or would you have two different nets > > that meet in a specific way? > > It's amazing how "obvious" it is to just put in an AGND and a DGND > symbol and connect them together... If they should connected at one point a zero ohm resistor or other separator symbol would split them and a footprint with a short trace will connect them at one point only but there still is the problem of footprint trace thickness. A special star ground footprint with one connection point there grounds are connected together may be a good solution. Symbolically a zero ohm resistor with n pins would work for any number of connections but how it should be done on PCB then there are more than four connections? Nicklas Karlsson