X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38 X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1DDAC6C0-384C-4F47-9DEB-18E6DC048197"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [geda-user] Stop playing stupid political games with gEDA X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2 From: John Doty In-Reply-To: <201510111954.t9BJsXx5022095@envy.delorie.com> Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 15:17:08 -0600 Message-Id: <85A80DC0-59E6-40CC-8BC3-7C5D225A5A0F@noqsi.com> References: <0788cca443ca40a88d6e21f1a216a759 AT net2air DOT co> <560D81CE DOT 1010800 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510012211 DOT t91MBXPI025587 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <560DB972 DOT 30203 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510012306 DOT t91N6MXc027775 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3705430D-86F7-45ED-AB09-4F9F737C8000 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <201510020536 DOT t925a5PK017417 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201510111954 DOT t9BJsXx5022095 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --Apple-Mail=_1DDAC6C0-384C-4F47-9DEB-18E6DC048197 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On Oct 11, 2015, at 1:54 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: >=20 >> IIRC, there was a period of time where the dev list was writable for >> devs only but could be read by everyone. Consequently some topics >> talked about on the dev-list were also raised and discussed on the >> user list. >=20 > IIRC we moved topics to the dev list because they didn't belong on the > user list, but some users kept moving them back so they could argue > with the developers, so the user list ended up full of inappropriate > topics anyway. Hence, abuse. It was impossible for the developers to > have a conversation without the users forcing their way into it. That you consider this abuse is one of the things what arouses = suspicion. Since developer actions impact users, a good developer = welcomes user input. >=20 >> In addition, posts to the user list had to be manually >> approved by a list administrator. By contrast, mails sent to the user >> list by developers did not need to be approved. >=20 > I don't recall that rule. Perhaps it was limited to abusers, not > non-developers. >=20 >> A few months later the old user list got shut down completely. A new >> mailing list was set up on a different server. The list of members = was >> not transferred. So the new list started empty. Again, no discussion, >> no warning. >=20 > Hmm... next time I create a mailing list, I need to warn you? >=20 >>> Now we have one list (geda-user) for general discussion, and we >>> happen to have a few other mailing lists that generally have no >>> discussion on them yet seem to be a hot spot for everyone who isn't >>> on them. >>=20 >> Make the archives public and the paranoia will vanish for the most >> part. >=20 > http://www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi?p=3Dgeda-user > http://www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi?p=3Dgeda-help >=20 > There you go. There's generally no traffic on any of the other lists, > so there are no archives to share. If you require archives to make > your paranoia go away, you'll be paranoid forever. >=20 >> IMHO, this is less about permission to be on a list but more about >> whether or not the content of communication is accessible to the >> ordinary user. >=20 > The problems we had in the past were not about that. They were about > people thinking they had a right to be *involved* in any given > conversation, even if the group having the conversation didn't want > them to be (for whatever reason). Sometimes devs want to have a quiet > discussion about a feature without everyone else making noise about it > and confusing the issue, but the geda community would not allow the > devs that option. Good. The last thing I want is a community of passive software = consumers. That would surely kill gEDA for my purposes. >=20 >> Some of the most successful open source projects make a point to >> communicate transparent as possible. >=20 > And some of the most successful ones have private lists. "Public" is > not a requirement to success, *respect* is. If the devs (or admins, > or whatever group) want to have a private conversation, others should > respect that. The gEDA community doesn't respect that. Because some developers have repeatedly given some of us reason to = distrust them. Their values are not ours. Development for the sake of = development risks disconnection from user concerns. You, in particular, = are tremendously talented at saying soothing things about preserving the = versatility of the tools, and immediately following up with statements = that show you don=92t understand their versatility at all. You say = =93users just want to get work done=94, but then fail to understand that = the toolkit is what enables this. >=20 >> It is the nature of a privilege that it diminishes those who don't >> have it. >=20 > Not if it's a priviledge earned. Granting that priviledge to just > anyone diminishes the value of earning it. Sometimes people aren't > equal because one of them puts in a lot of hard work to better > themselves. >=20 The trust of users is also something that must be earned. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ jpd AT noqsi DOT com --Apple-Mail=_1DDAC6C0-384C-4F47-9DEB-18E6DC048197 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWGtHVAAoJEF1Aj/0UKykRRb8QALDfDy39jS40jIgg2GwGtB7w uP/wah+Guvss96gS+076eCrUcg6DYgU4QK0Hhhfzs+glL8Ix4saDoN7qVQjZ78uE 4gQx/2fdfLxrrtjb9K8DH3AEHnB+IFb9M6ab4XAXBZBGlxN/UA9kV/jV7N5XOUvA tw7z2XagPyorV/BvXBhMvBF7DLrW9uN3eHr8EauFOlN7rVY5FG44pl2i2EFyFZ5P WQvXJBTYQztwIJItm/O/d4CLviW1bKBxR/VjIziAMZUuWj5gDrj2xEhBLbBCq4ob aflrr5ucYFq7Ysvq0nwJY+uXxF7EJ9ovUZZ46uabifYqMj5VbRtNPpqp5WrayrjY DQFxRnXrp4GwWXIH2unv0aHF0yEEhu0snkbJonINBD161clXDqJXXWCpv9/ytKpB zdvt/bVSuSLanLiGJQumQuzmQuOr2GEgpMpTEznlaI4ozydg+JSHgnCOuxgBC3F0 QjZbu4Mh++Sbwf3Gq0Pdqi7ciixF/fNos0lf2Z7rhL25nw3Gvex47CVDUKj2yN7v dLy/thAFXUaHALEterApAjkGFoPsGt6hrIW0Fi/tI0U42U5n7O32Dy1//UFlNWPE OkGTw67mb6NpePeFpsxW67Q1nDWUU+6FVRGqdb4DC8jtrvsOXFccb3AJ29y9oFHk m6IzgvjJys78clbTkIw8 =cb76 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_1DDAC6C0-384C-4F47-9DEB-18E6DC048197--