X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 05:22:57 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv To: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu Subject: Re: [geda-user] Stop playing stupid political games with gEDA In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <560DB972 DOT 30203 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510012306 DOT t91N6MXc027775 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <560DCC35 DOT 9010505 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510020041 DOT t920fM6o031268 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <560DE183 DOT 4060305 AT jump-ing DOT de> <5BF9C4DF-32C7-4C06-9F96-8F82C935254E AT sbcglobal DOT net> <560EAEE1 DOT 6020701 AT jump-ing DOT de> <3E72AC35-5862-41B9-A8FD-6804E89E9FFB AT sbcglobal DOT net> <20151003210144 DOT GA21262 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <56104E16 DOT 3050006 AT jump-ing DOT de> <20151003222928 DOT GC4287 AT localhost DOT localdomain> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sun, 4 Oct 2015, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 2:48 AM, wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, 4 Oct 2015, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via >> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >> >> >> >>> Igor2 is off working on something using SDL because it is maintained >>> but has a slower release cycle. The logical reason being that we don't >>> really care about new gtk functionality but we have to burn time >>> fixing things for each major gtk release. >> >> >> SPOLIER ALERT: I am not talking about gschem or pcb here; I don't say any of >> the geda tools should or should not use gtk. I just share my personal >> opinion about using gtk in general. I won't respond to text that ignores >> this. >> >> Yes, I think GTK is a bad idea long term (for any application), and it's not >> qt that'd solve this. My resoning goes: > > Google would agree with you they dumped it. > http://tech.slashdot.org/story/14/03/12/0147256/google-to-replace-gtk-with-its-own-aura-in-chrome Nice! >> - GTK doesn't look native on anything else than gnome. Most other toolkits >> have the same property: native only on one or on a few systems. So using >> anything else doesn't make this worse or better. (If an app wants to look >> native on multiple platforms, it needs multiple native GUI frontends, one >> for each platform.) > > MATE is actively developed and based on GTK2 (migrating slowly to > GTK3) because the users and developers like GNOME2 and hated using > OpenGL for everything the way GNOME3 does. SDL2 does this cleverly: you can chose, per window, to use software rendering or acceleration, when you create the window. There are drawing primitives that are compatible with both. I will make it possible for the user to switch between sw rendering, hw accel and auto-select (default) at application startup-time. > > I said earlier on the geda-developers list that a good blue sky > project would be giving geda a way to have multiple GUI's like pcb > does with hid. I second that. PCB benefits from having HIDs - not only because it makes it easier to add a new HID, but I believe it made the code better by inserting an API between the engine and the UI. I believe gschem could benefit the same way. Regards, Igor2