X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=V3JG8allLAU/5ycj0Xhw6mor/NNh5Q8MKOVPAQRlmTg=; b=oAvMaLb2xNhd3C/4y+lcGCrGh/BoZGrFDG6c6Ktgfoyc/AfLs39OLPc8P1y+nCSKkp yX0Vy7Fj8dlqMI1vdh5D6LvmKKNQaYopg8aS1+6eVbwV9L6zGsPZnK++iXnvtow0O9Sz F73A6LhPavg5rDm7DbyqLwNnfRa2a7ZiKUHjGJeeSxkrFF96MLYe7FwyewXRBwVHP/p/ SSeFHQaC+3JuN+f1o0rh7+l3L0LH27of4l3np8w0q0z695YIynBDuNhROjB4/UtP4xva ZmuSc55EWe3nuFTyRvI//HDoM8Y3qIyfehfo+LHtLlX8Ky+yECC+QFVyt7/yjqsmpRna hW9w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.209.80 with SMTP id i77mr5694419lfg.92.1443926979648; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 19:49:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3C084FA0-E756-4D90-A4AD-C1C1D8431000@noqsi.com> References: <201510020536 DOT t925a5PK017417 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <0788cca443ca40a88d6e21f1a216a759 AT net2air DOT co> <560D81CE DOT 1010800 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510012211 DOT t91MBXPI025587 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <560DB972 DOT 30203 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510012306 DOT t91N6MXc027775 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3705430D-86F7-45ED-AB09-4F9F737C8000 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <560EA183 DOT 8000508 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510021906 DOT t92J6v9r019933 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201510040016 DOT t940GpCE003940 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3C084FA0-E756-4D90-A4AD-C1C1D8431000 AT noqsi DOT com> Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 02:49:39 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Stop playing stupid political games with gEDA From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: gEDA users mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t942niQX006388 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 2:18 AM, John Doty wrote: > > On Oct 3, 2015, at 8:16 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > >> I'll thank you to not insult our users. > > You’re like the person who goes into Ikea and says “it would be better if you didn’t have to assemble this stuff”. That’s certainly insulting to any shopper who knows what Ikea is. If you don’t want to assemble your own furniture you should just go to a different store. Has this thing the two of you do ever actually advanced the project? The issue is users have trouble with the fact that the console is console/Makefile driven. I proposed earlier to have a program that lets you define workflows in gschem and then produce a Makefile just like we design schematics in gschem and then make netlists via gschem. Does anyone else have an idea? Bigger question for the whole of gEDA. Igor2 posted a really nice demo of gschem handling back annotation (really notation) and none of you said squat on the list. For a feature you were all clambering for the interest in it has been mostly hypothetical. Why are we all so interested in gtk versions when that could really use some feedback? > John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. > http://www.noqsi.com/ > jpd AT noqsi DOT com > > -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/