X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=E5mA3z96LfH3iGp0xLyxYsi/LlNBgO5n2mSDrHsm53k=; b=GLIkIHZYwsZhfFQZ85EAFBe/SJRuq0PVH8ueE3EsfjMjFUOSl7JrZovGYL3TBy7RIP hEglMPlyYUohFDmPejnhHbop9Zb0h/ba72uKAvr5lcLyBDWsG+/oEGHErE+j8UjmNlOR hn0omkXZj6RnunNTqsxacurM9hWcO6yJznrupu1ArJ3ZxoeybKcqR/e65xiPAuY+4Ebn mK8V6sZkofiw/AMCvwMMNFa66rJlhEYagBsDay3VrOi+9Ss9nKXN4qjTIXZ1sChYGL56 t89juCKf8ljEwWoscaB3IXxE1ZXFReqJl+pdF/uL3u/yiM7/Um+Z6YnFscLbaoaD/RSX 5TMQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.39.193 with SMTP id r1mr3872176wik.57.1443912478883; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 15:47:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <560F9BE2.80104@jump-ing.de> References: <560F9BE2 DOT 80104 AT jump-ing DOT de> Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 14:47:58 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] making DRC less misleading in the presence of shorts, non-routed rats, etc. From: "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2b93064089e05213b12ab Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --001a11c2b93064089e05213b12ab Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > Am 03.10.2015 um 04:41 schrieb Kai-Martin Knaak: > > You mean a use case where the user manually deletes long range rats to > > get a better feel for the local situation? IMHO, a delete is already a > > crutch in itself. > > Generated rat lines are only a hint. If one deletes them, they'll > re-appear on the next "optmize rats", so they're not really "deleted". > Yeah, but if the user has already taken trouble to make sure that only the rats they want to work on routing at the moment are shown, it's obnoxious to trash that rat set and show the whole mess again, or make them go through the selection process a second time. --001a11c2b93064089e05213b12ab Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wr= ote:
Am 03.10.2015 um 04= :41 schrieb Kai-Martin Knaak:
> You mean a use case where the user manually deletes long range rats to=
> get a better feel for the local situation? IMHO, a delete is already a=
> crutch in itself.

Generated rat lines are only a hint. If one deletes them, they'l= l
re-appear on the next "optmize rats", so they're not really &= quot;deleted".

Yeah, bu= t if the user has already taken trouble to make sure that only the rats the= y want to work on routing at the moment are shown, it's obnoxious to tr= ash that rat set and show the whole mess again, or make them go through the= selection process a second time.
=C2=A0
--001a11c2b93064089e05213b12ab--