X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=adNDMRPkz9uMkNNUgcWrglisnsGrcWNaNLSK4ZCws38=; b=ZORk+zkuFbcc4aTSxkMBUFjMc0ZuwKqVPTi9zzup+aacyCwkOEtZ28e2pxgF1QiyiQ 5N9fCDUnVKLuAb5IBZ67uUVSQSE+WV79LmGcJ1uqYwNQmcZaKi7IXGmZlf/2yCwFBlgz CPnCdp9FI87L97KieDrNJP3j2GQ+v21w2ne39Pg9I2sJbBGLalaLwMhR3HPoEGuDLXAB qhHoDE7My43vwZJjsRHB1tpCEGLLPBZqsDMNrUOS2eVlQEB5M1hXSBykLfWG06UzF9zH Yy5dXjyHhIL+MoIt5dZgjn+wd2NAWjE8+pKAv8qymkTl0RRqvhreFKTOpe5ZKQUQ03oa dOTw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.8.227 with SMTP id u3mr22680662wja.38.1443912375213; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 15:46:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <560F9AC7.3040607@jump-ing.de> References: <560F9AC7 DOT 3040607 AT jump-ing DOT de> Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 14:46:15 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] making DRC less misleading in the presence of shorts, non-routed rats, etc. From: "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d9c0736261f05213b0ce3 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --047d7b5d9c0736261f05213b0ce3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 1:07 AM, Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > Am 03.10.2015 um 01:21 schrieb Britton Kerin: > > > At the moment DRC catches near-shorts (trace too close to another), but > is > > completely silent when there's an actual short. > > That's expected, that's what DRC does. Checking for shorts means to > When I started, it was not at all expected. Its weird that you can go from almost-short, to short, and thereby make a violation vanish. In fact it's pretty easy to accidentally create a short while fixing a proximity violation. I happened to catch it before ordering the prototype boards but only --047d7b5d9c0736261f05213b0ce3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 1:07 AM, Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wr= ote:
Am 03.10.2015 um 01= :21 schrieb Britton Kerin:

> At the moment DRC catches near-shorts (trace too close to another), bu= t is
> completely silent when there's an actual short.

That's expected, that's what DRC does. Checking for shorts m= eans to

When I started, it was not at a= ll expected.=C2=A0 Its weird that you can go from almost-short, to short, a= nd thereby make a violation vanish.=C2=A0 In fact it's pretty easy to a= ccidentally create a short while fixing a proximity violation.=C2=A0 I happ= ened to catch it before ordering the prototype boards but only=C2=A0
<= /div>
--047d7b5d9c0736261f05213b0ce3--