X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=LLk3y8QwMXZm8tr2aSvcKMOXvSuYOtmrg1GhRIOgrAw=; b=Uewhw5V8AjYEnmwn2Eyj/L1HxInY4jQ4YJCuCJeWWXGpNHB8vPqH/XhhGodIiRHxqd C2ay7gzgZq4vlArGbFquZQ+aYP3CnYM7MAzq33VkBD6MZwBYdsvrnQvgbvTJ/Orp3StP XxC7WmpuUmQGKnuVw9FmGyKh27uBbfyW0mXymHFwGgWxmOKbrHlzzhemeYhE5c8YB26O XlbljLXyDZYlvV2WAQxnz2T1pIt885npFuRF7kz5HCnJr3nnDGavk6+C0WgvXyoVpvdq 4kzjrosOYMn9/Ba8d8vzN5VvBIq7pFGCf/pL76e1//RFEzxr7Z9tOusDPLjd/CDGM9s2 4xEw== X-Received: by 10.112.13.161 with SMTP id i1mr8413133lbc.96.1443911370685; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 15:29:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 01:29:28 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Stop playing stupid political games with gEDA Message-ID: <20151003222928.GC4287@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <560DB972 DOT 30203 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510012306 DOT t91N6MXc027775 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <560DCC35 DOT 9010505 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201510020041 DOT t920fM6o031268 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <560DE183 DOT 4060305 AT jump-ing DOT de> <5BF9C4DF-32C7-4C06-9F96-8F82C935254E AT sbcglobal DOT net> <560EAEE1 DOT 6020701 AT jump-ing DOT de> <3E72AC35-5862-41B9-A8FD-6804E89E9FFB AT sbcglobal DOT net> <20151003210144 DOT GA21262 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <56104E16 DOT 3050006 AT jump-ing DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56104E16.3050006@jump-ing.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 11:52:22PM +0200, Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: ... > My personal opinion is to bump it only if it's neccessary for some > substantial advantage. I wouldn't bump the version for the purpose of > bumping it. The one advantage I see is moving the project forward. In order to bump the version we have to throw out obsolete functions and replace them with new ones, which as a whole will ease transition to gtk3 in future. Cheers, Vladimir