X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=mail.ud03.udmedia.de; h=
	subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=beta; bh=
	5spKuuaoaoQNyKdXWhkmdBjbgn2CCfuLbiM7mXg+dIo=; b=QQwvW2p5oprZrNge
	kz7GwuTM+xZRA5cWRp6kFDzsCpeUDfkzjAuA/3Z4UEtAaEiJAjsoF+w7ih/YdAGR
	B0CzIyKsCrcvxBYYdby5t7wEOsjCoxTpD5UJUN5hQAHqBvYA+lhFuEY1wSzuIA0e
	EoLbWvqfSJVoUz2iWcIymBz0TlM=
Subject: Re: [geda-user] making DRC less misleading in the presence of shorts,
 non-routed rats, etc.
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <CAC4O8c_kjtsHhyjH+fPZvhDdPxc+Z+L5RxPy4SpJ8dmcGNKMiA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <munf8m$u7l$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
From: "Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <560F9BE2.80104@jump-ing.de>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 11:12:02 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <munf8m$u7l$1@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Am 03.10.2015 um 04:41 schrieb Kai-Martin Knaak:
> You mean a use case where the user manually deletes long range rats to 
> get a better feel for the local situation? IMHO, a delete is already a 
> crutch in itself.

Generated rat lines are only a hint. If one deletes them, they'll
re-appear on the next "optmize rats", so they're not really "deleted".


Markus

-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/