X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com From: Kai-Martin Knaak Subject: Re: [geda-user] Parts with internally connected pins Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 21:06:34 +0200 Organization: Institut =?ISO-8859-1?Q?f=FCr?= Quantenoptik Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Complaints-To: usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 130.75.103.107 User-Agent: KNode/4.14.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t5CJ6oMN003520 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Donald Tillman wrote: > My current approach, giving the shield pins the same pin number in the > footprint, isn't bad, the rats nest just complains about missing > connections. And I can add the connections, it's not holding me up. In some cases, the redundant connection can be considered beneficial. E.g. the multiple ground pins of a micro controller. Or the shield of a CAT6 RJ45 connector. > But I'm wondering if there's an approach that's more preferable, that's > more in line with the internals. How about this: 1) all internally connected pins receive the same pin number 2) the designer can attach an ignore flag in the layout tool to the rat. This would make pcb ignore the respective rat when it assembles the currently unmet rats nests. ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak tel: +49-511-762-2895 Universität Hannover, Inst. für Quantenoptik fax: +49-511-762-2211 Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover http://www.iqo.uni-hannover.de GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Knaak+kmk&op=get