X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=tjLku0rnAoplv8A63bPntvDlydHhIe4dkPgcJrrz02s=; b=Rpnmtnez0ycgW7Hw4P61oit7qxDaBdrjcyj/fJ4YmaZSY0w7f353ahDFJ+THenn0oq IWNhdLSip4v/T8DyOWMlUSepQkYgbHGS7bQ3AtDSn++/RAB/jqzI1iy3qc6OOwdODFp2 IHqx1E5u5ZGB1CkuOdsUj7LGTbT/GU/mLRcs95EzdGyuv8GvQ6ACgRpw3fQDfpHy2CuJ uD2D0xEvfoTpYoChxWwssY7DhUmS2oW4cnzav+J1k7UMy1lYl8esXNw8JkYyb6pgKbSp V7nWRkLz6E4yQg+zh+tRUpts6SG7DCidge+4ZSXZqfVAS007xnAqhI/zwC59GYGJ8KWI oMkA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.115.68 with SMTP id jm4mr17473001oeb.45.1394647939529; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 11:12:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140311211548.2A88E8020170@turkos.aspodata.se> References: <20140127234944 DOT 924148045B78 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20140128201110 DOT DF7D78045B78 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20140129072550 DOT GA24560 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <86CABBE6-EE80-4347-B7AA-3F5A8DA4C658 AT noqsi DOT com> <1394402434 DOT 2151 DOT 28 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box> <20140311130801 DOT 94D928020170 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20140311211548 DOT 2A88E8020170 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 22:12:19 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] identical symbol names From: =?KOI8-R?B?4czFy9PFyiDowdLYy8/X08vJyg==?= To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0115f36805d93b04f46cc76f Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --089e0115f36805d93b04f46cc76f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Well, your idea with the in-file-lib is better than EMBEDDED, but > perhaps EMBEDDED should be deprecated. > Not. I think that is not right. Surely there are people who use it. I do not think that's a good idea to deprive them of the usual tools. Correctly to allow the user to select concepts. > 3, and distribution > > > > > Am I right? > > > > > Yes. > > Good, can we do that without any copying ? > I think it is not does without copying Good. I see your in-file-lib as one candidate. > I'd like to investigate how gschem can interact with repositories, > if we can solve that, I'd rather use that instead of in-file-lib. > I'll use it. It would be offensively if the following versions of the patch will not work. --089e0115f36805d93b04f46cc76f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Well, your idea with the in-f= ile-lib is better than EMBEDDED, but
perhaps EMBEDDED should be deprecated.
Not.=A0 I think that is not right.
Surely there a= re people who use it.
I do not think that&#= 39;s a good idea to deprive them of the usual tools.
Correctly to allow the user to select concepts.

<= div class=3D""> > 3, and distribution
> >
> Am I right?
> >
> Yes.

Good, can we do that without any copying ?
I think i= t is not does without copying

=
Good. I see your in-file-lib as one candidate.
I'd like to investigate how gschem can interact with repositories,
if we can solve that, I'd rather use that instead of in-file-lib.
I'll us= e it.
It w= ould be
= offensively if the following versions of the patch will not work.


--089e0115f36805d93b04f46cc76f--