X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at neurotica.com Message-ID: <50A7B4B6.4070002@neurotica.com> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 11:00:54 -0500 From: Dave McGuire User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] OT: ARM JTAG connectors References: <50A6BBDA DOT 7000100 AT neurotica DOT com> <50A77640 DOT 2040302 AT zepler DOT net> <20121117131530 DOT 31297 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <50A7AD42 DOT 9030903 AT neurotica DOT com> <20121117155245 DOT 11918 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> In-Reply-To: <20121117155245.11918.qmail@stuge.se> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com On 11/17/2012 10:52 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: >>>> I think you're talking about these: http://www.tag-connect.com/ >>>> >>>> I haven't tried them yet, so can't comment. They have symbols >>>> for gEDA, which is nice. >>> >>> The symbols have 0,0 at the top left leg latch hole - even the -NL >>> symbol which doesn't have those holes! >> >> Oops! Are you gonna let 'em know? > > That's a thought. The symbols are user-provided in return for a free > cable though, and all symbols are clearly marked as YMMV, so I don't > expect them to care too much about it.. I'd expect them to care, at least a bit, because it directly affects the adoption of their product. >> Their TC2050-ARM2010 adapter board omits nTRST and RTCK >> signals...not sure what's up with that. I've just emailed them to >> ask. If their response is good, I'll be ordering a setup from them. > > $35 for the cable is reasonable. $29.95 for a <1" sq PCB with two > connectors on it is however not reasonable. :) I'd just make my > own adapter. Yes, I agree. This would be expensed, though, in this case. ;) -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA