X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=icloud.com; s=1a1hai; t=1696946233; bh=R+hRWhGZzXL8AbCPlv+m/lfhyqsHeuXzVqQmdedoTFo=; h=From:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:To:Message-Id; b=RJyw1ZmPN1HGzefjFPexKBYWcGZMRJ1IZwg3cWW3+MXLJGGyaxIj4qqN4VvDFXDOz GBFIpdvmd0fnhUxp8RY6zeranM0viAcx6g9ts389ulIql7kfvNM86pl6LRTX1UX6vl ahjiJABZOHfNv6IVz8hxRYIMb7ejt7NF2uKqYECLtUlj36eeii9eolecYza0YEKlK+ ixUeZLP66quiXeoHUm4Whtf3q+1qyWmtbgENw+N44SjA+4gSQy16O+PcfDkuBd9gpu /EOtBUGqjkz2OGw7twl8tu2RuuBTxow7Ge1lhKmITzSm4COkVm22op+kWVmSB/dRPc JjGPv6qNoGyMA== From: "Chris Smith (space DOT dandy AT icloud DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_792CAB27-69FC-4F7C-AA48-A5A29B59B20E" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.100.2.1.4\)) Subject: Re: [geda-user] is geda dead yet? Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 14:57:01 +0100 References: <202310100335 DOT 39A3Zn6W3486400 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <6DAB37C8-0CA1-4BFA-A11A-1526E6960708 AT icloud DOT com> <20231010121556 DOT A8D518623BB4 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com In-Reply-To: <20231010121556.A8D518623BB4@turkos.aspodata.se> Message-Id: <28BA1856-5DD7-4D8B-9642-7F42E0E114F8@icloud.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.100.2.1.4) X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: d9wevFJ_0w28XgHM7vbAswOMSu3IAl5O X-Proofpoint-GUID: d9wevFJ_0w28XgHM7vbAswOMSu3IAl5O X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: =?UTF-8?Q?vendor=3Dfsecure_engine=3D1.1.170-22c6f66c430a71ce266a39bfe25bc?= =?UTF-8?Q?2903e8d5c8f:6.0.138,18.0.957,17.11.170.22.0000000_definitions?= =?UTF-8?Q?=3D2023-05-18=5F15:2020-02-14=5F02,2023-05-18=5F15,2023-02-09?= =?UTF-8?Q?=5F01_signatures=3D0?= X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=813 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2212070000 definitions=main-2310100102 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --Apple-Mail=_792CAB27-69FC-4F7C-AA48-A5A29B59B20E Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > On 10 Oct 2023, at 13:15, karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] = wrote: >=20 > marcel: > ... >> A KiCAD schematic looks awfully clunky/cluttered (to me). >=20 > I guess that is due to that you cannot use multiple symbols for the > same component/package, i.e. you cannot show the signal flow. Do you mean like splitting a processor into I/O blocks and power blocks, = for example? If so, that isn=E2=80=99t an issue at all. With respect, I think most of your criticisms may be based on outdated = experience. Chris =E2=80=94 Chris Smith --Apple-Mail=_792CAB27-69FC-4F7C-AA48-A5A29B59B20E Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8

On = 10 Oct 2023, at 13:15, karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] = <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

marcel:
...
A KiCAD schematic looks awfully clunky/cluttered (to = me).

I guess that is due to that you cannot use = multiple symbols for the
same component/package, i.e. you cannot show = the signal flow.

Do you mean = like splitting a processor into I/O blocks and power blocks, for = example? If so, that isn=E2=80=99t an issue at = all.

With respect, I think most of your = criticisms may be based on outdated = experience.

Chris
=E2=80=94
Chris Smith = <space DOT dandy AT icloud DOT com>

= --Apple-Mail=_792CAB27-69FC-4F7C-AA48-A5A29B59B20E--