X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.7+dev
X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl
X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: inbox
From: "karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] is geda dead yet?
In-reply-to: <c66488c854233e4402d445f87f9d4026@iae.nl>
References: <202310100335 DOT 39A3Zn6W3486400 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <6DAB37C8-0CA1-4BFA-A11A-1526E6960708 AT icloud DOT com> <c66488c854233e4402d445f87f9d4026 AT iae DOT nl>
Comments: In-reply-to "mhx AT iae DOT nl [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
   message dated "Tue, 10 Oct 2023 13:53:48 +0200."
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <20231010121556.A8D518623BB4@turkos.aspodata.se>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 14:15:56 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

marcel:
...
> A KiCAD schematic looks awfully clunky/cluttered (to me).

I guess that is due to that you cannot use multiple symbols for the
same component/package, i.e. you cannot show the signal flow.
 Instead kicad relies on net symbols, which makes it hard to follow.
And it just becomes a net table in schematic form, there are even
people making the tables and have some program generating some "not
really needed" schemtics.

Lepton/geda support for hierarchical design and mult. symbols for the
same component helps a log makeing schematics easier to follow.

Regards,
/Karl Hammar