X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.7+dev X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: inbox From: "karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] is geda dead yet? In-reply-to: <6DAB37C8-0CA1-4BFA-A11A-1526E6960708@icloud.com> References: <202310100335 DOT 39A3Zn6W3486400 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <6DAB37C8-0CA1-4BFA-A11A-1526E6960708 AT icloud DOT com> Comments: In-reply-to "Chris Smith (space DOT dandy AT icloud DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" message dated "Tue, 10 Oct 2023 11:03:11 +0100." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20231010120653.8ED068623BB4@turkos.aspodata.se> Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 14:06:53 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Chris Smith: ... > The final ’nail in the coffin’ for geda, and the reason that I canned > my own effort, was KiCAD’s switch to a plain text S-expression file > format. Kicad's use of that format is faulty, in this I agree with Tibor Palinkas: http://repo.hu/cgi-bin/pool.cgi?project=pcb-rnd&cmd=show&node=kicad_fmt_fun > KiCAD now ticks every box for me that geda once did, in addition to > being actively developed, supported and working out-of-the-box on > multiple platforms. I can use each of the KiCAD tools in a non-PCB, > workflow agnostic manner if I need to, just as I did with geda. Good for you. For me, kicad fails due to . inferiour hierarchical support . no copy and paste between running programs . difficult to run multiple instances of the same program at least up to v.5.1.9. Regards, /Karl Hammar