X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.7+dev X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: inbox From: "karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Unknown config key In-reply-to: <87pm91wycv.fsf@lepton.mail-host-address-is-not-set> References: <20230319120044 DOT 4EA0585F61DE AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20230320112351 DOT 68F568497643 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <87355xyjnm DOT fsf AT lepton DOT mail-host-address-is-not-set> <20230321210043 DOT 1EEB68497643 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <87pm91wycv DOT fsf AT lepton DOT mail-host-address-is-not-set> Comments: In-reply-to "vzh (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" message dated "Wed, 22 Mar 2023 00:58:36 +0300." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20230321230810.404DF8497643@turkos.aspodata.se> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 00:08:10 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Vladimir: > Karl: > > Vladimir: > > ... > >> Unlike in previous C code, processing of short options is dropped > >> as they were intended only for using as command line options and > >> other using is not documented. > >> > >> So I'm not going to change it. Moreover, the project rc files are > >> subject to be replaced with standard lepton configuration files, > >> lepton.conf and such. > > ... > > > > Soo, what happened with: > >>> Our approach is just doing reliable changes on each step > >>> trying to avoid stressing our users :-) > > :-) I think it's unreliable to rely on undocumented features. I think it was sufficiently documented in 2012 for me to use it: $ git log gsch2pcb commit a523dad710de78a730c67f408eb8561194aadcd3 Author: Karl Hammar Date: Sun Nov 8 19:33:24 2015 +0100 rm unused commit a7349b92fc9159be84005a55baebd9a9a5df4d29 Author: Karl Hammar Date: Fri Aug 17 22:13:31 2012 +0200 my ~/.gEDA files so you can reproduce my designs > > I don't see the point of changing the rc file. It is more > > reasonable to do the change when it is converted to standard > > lepton conf. files. > > We're towards it. The sooner we (re)write/review related code the > faster it happens. (I, for one, don't like releases with intermediate > results which confuse the users.) Well, apply the patch then. > > Nevermind, just change the "Unknown config key" to something > > more user friendly. > > What would you suggest? Will "Unknown config key (short config keys are > no longer supported)" do? Don't know, it just seems an unnessesary change for no gain. It took me a while to hunt it down. You'll get rid of it when you convert to your config files, so what's the hurry, just let legacy be legacy. Regards, /Karl Hammar