X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1670531409; x=1670617809; bh=rDvlYSeB3p roIHjob1t0yXWhBJlpd4fAbmK7Lsmmplk=; b=beqat7sXaebyWb5mOlzw0gHn75 7pVfX6oUy1qK3pJWYjjJy/WeHJxMf0e6pFwv5+7Wq2jlBL7ij3W7HGHhGMePtB24 LLuRVz5/70itXp0x93od5tJw9mYiqucRhBXuPTEmHvxI3XGMIBCpJY5RpuGu4FNK ne+fAxn4ELsas3LWidVI/9Wj+Ulaq7/5uJNZ7lVuuGhDz7qtEKdf+547oP2wPGbq lGz9jKcxGzuUy+mthp1r8aRHnycPzxkPwP9STV0UFyDYO9S90EjUbcL0+RSCTNhp mO4TqVNA8KGtRSihvWRMEiT7TUJwgyDjonTX+wRPbEMb0vvhNMIp00H2x0yw== X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1670531409; x=1670617809; bh=rDvlYSeB3proIHjob1t0yXWhBJlp d4fAbmK7Lsmmplk=; b=KLDpCqojtTv7+bllciBpSVguolvBkJzBmxfXLKwfTjoV jIz+MfEgdrar5/Vdigs8GgzqYRKpQDQcL6SNWXjqZoj4/A4ME30UErvguJ2ePf3T lr1lorPkYwjQa6pDO3LAF5pM1v1BTVqtgETHt2RGEtegUgg+FYxZNViigUca2crw pMXtbYaEj57CjjMF3KCsC2BPJlvrZ1iq3wB2HYtXuDiJ/rb7xnDRkLxu7qiMxPes VedrFcPhK3T0VyplOoKSDI68qOpt++onQOKjbBvWUXdc60GN/6LTsGwCiMkMN6Rk +RHE/Z50WG1x2tSPK5hiVDaixT4iy8Pe0whAUk0shg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrvddtgddufeelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgesrgdtre ertdefjeenucfhrhhomhepifhirhhvihhnucfjvghrrhcuoehghhgvrhhrlhdvsehfrghs thhmrghilhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffeuvdefkeekvdeuveegveffje ejvdeftdehkeefvddufeduueeuieeiieeifeevnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgvggurgdqphhr ohhjvggtthdrohhrghdpghhnuhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehghhgvrhhrlhdvsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: iee494631:Fastmail Subject: Re: [geda-user] geda-gaf 64-bit and guile 3.0.7 compatibility To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <2c419a98-b58d-b138-f5b0-f75ebee6b715 AT fastmail DOT com> <20221207231139 DOT 16849 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> From: "Girvin Herr (gherrl2 AT fastmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Message-ID: Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 12:28:45 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20221207231139.16849.qmail@stuge.se> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------8976CE3DEBE7144AFAB97CEF" Content-Language: en-US Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------8976CE3DEBE7144AFAB97CEF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/7/22 3:11 PM, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > Girvin Herr (gherrl2 AT fastmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >> 1. Will geda-gaf compile for and run on AMD 64-bit Linux without >> multilib (32-bit library support)? > That should work fine. (I've used geda-gaf on amd64 for a long time.) > > >> 2. Will geda-gaf work with guile 3.0.7? > I don't know about this, sorry. > > > //Peter Peter, Thanks for your prompt reply. It is good to hear I should have no problem building and running geda-gaf on AMD64. As for guile, I had a problem with geda back in December 2020 when 1.10.1 was released. Changes were made in *.1 that required guile 2.2 and my Slackware still had guile 2.0. Now, Slackware 15.0 has gone to guile 3.0.7, so I am concerned about guile 3.0.7 breaking geda 1.10.2. If you want to know more about what happened back then and have time to read it (I counted 43 postings and counting), here is the thread subject: "Problem with Guile 2.2.4 dependency for gEDA 1.10.1" As a result of this thread's dialog, geda version 1.10.2 was released with support for both guile 2.2 and guile 2.0. Now I am faced with guile 3.0 and if geda does not support it, it is a deal-breaker for me and I will have to stick with my current Slackware 14.2. BTW: The download site README at: http://ftp.geda-project.org/geda-gaf/stable/v1.10/1.10.2/geda-gaf-1.10.2-README.txt still shows Guile >= 2.2.4 listed: ... You *must* also have the following libraries installed, including their development files: - Guile 2.2 ("GNU's Ubiquitous Intelligent Language for Extensions") >= 2.2.4 ... One could assume ">=" means just that and guile 3.0.7 is okay, but... Thanks. Girvin --------------8976CE3DEBE7144AFAB97CEF Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


On 12/7/22 3:11 PM, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
Girvin Herr (gherrl2 AT fastmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
1. Will geda-gaf compile for and run on AMD 64-bit Linux without 
multilib (32-bit library support)?
That should work fine. (I've used geda-gaf on amd64 for a long time.)


2. Will geda-gaf work with guile 3.0.7?
I don't know about this, sorry.


//Peter

Peter,

Thanks for your prompt reply.

It is good to hear I should have no problem building and running geda-gaf on AMD64.

As for guile, I had a problem with geda back in December 2020 when 1.10.1 was released. Changes were made in *.1 that required guile 2.2 and my Slackware still had guile 2.0. Now, Slackware 15.0 has gone to guile 3.0.7, so I am concerned about guile 3.0.7 breaking geda 1.10.2. If you want to know more about what happened back then and have time to read it (I counted 43 postings and counting), here is the thread subject:

"Problem with Guile 2.2.4 dependency for gEDA 1.10.1"

As a result of this thread's dialog, geda version 1.10.2 was released with support for both guile 2.2 and guile 2.0. Now I am faced with guile 3.0 and if geda does not support it, it is a deal-breaker for me and I will have to stick with my current Slackware 14.2.

BTW: The download site README at:

http://ftp.geda-project.org/geda-gaf/stable/v1.10/1.10.2/geda-gaf-1.10.2-README.txt

still shows Guile >= 2.2.4 listed:

...

You *must* also have the following libraries installed, including
their development files:

 - Guile 2.2 ("GNU's Ubiquitous Intelligent Language for Extensions")
   >= 2.2.4 <https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/>

...

One could assume ">=" means just that and guile 3.0.7 is okay, but...

Thanks.

Girvin


--------------8976CE3DEBE7144AFAB97CEF--