. So, spice-noqsi-model-name=3Dnbjt would be OK. However, the default = prototypes use model-name the same way as other spice back ends, so it = should probably be the same for all of them. gnet-spice-noqsi is mostly = backward compatible with gnet-spice-sdb, which is mostly backward = compatible with gnet-spice. And I, at least, have a lot of schematics = that use model-name, so changing it would be a big problem. >=20 > So, at least on the surface, Rolands suggestion seems good. >=20 > /// >=20 > The page above says: > "See http://gpleda.org/ for details on Lepton and lepton-netlist." > maybe you should change that to the lepton site. >=20 > Regards, > /Karl Hammar >=20 >=20 >=20 John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. jpd AT noqsi DOT com --Apple-Mail=_B7046254-156D-4364-BC7B-B82A89A639A5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

On Aug 25, 2022, at 2:42 PM, karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

John:
On Aug 25, 2022, at = 12:09 PM, Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org> wrote:

b)= defining the pinnumber for use with SPICE backends.

IMHO, b) should be renamed to "spice:pinseq=3D",
...
gnet-spice-noqsi (https://github.com/noqsi/gnet-spice-noqsi)
uses its much more flexible spice-prototype attribute for = that.

Which is ?

In https://github.com/noqsi/gnet-spice-noqsi/wiki/Referenceyou have attr@ so you can transfer any geda/lepton = attribute
to the spice world, Is that what you mean ?

The macro = expander also understands pin numbering, pinseq attributes (mostly for = backward compatibility), and hierarchy.

I'd say if you use the backend name as a = prefix or something,
like nosqi:model-name=3Dnbjt or = nosqi=3Dmodel-name=3Dnbjt it would
clear that that part = goes to nosqi and nowhere else, wouldn't
that be a good = thing ?

Noqsi Aerospace is the name of my company: There are = other Noqsi tools, see for example https://github.com/noqsi/noqsi-lepton-addons. = So,

spice-noqsi-model-name=3Dnbjt would be OK. However, the = default prototypes use model-name the same way as other spice back ends, = so it should probably be the same for all of them. gnet-spice-noqsi is = mostly backward compatible with gnet-spice-sdb, which is mostly backward = compatible with gnet-spice. And I, at least, have a lot of schematics = that use model-name, so changing it would be a big = problem.

So, at least = on the surface, Rolands suggestion seems good.

///

The page above says:
"See http://gpleda.org/ for details on Lepton and = lepton-netlist."
maybe you should change that to the = lepton site.

Regards,
/Karl = Hammar

John Doty = Noqsi = Aerospace, Ltd.

jpd AT noqsi DOT com

= --Apple-Mail=_B7046254-156D-4364-BC7B-B82A89A639A5--