X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.7+dev
X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl
X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: inbox
From: "karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] schematic attributes
In-reply-to: <B235A836-B344-47B2-A98D-9FDEA3674EB5@noqsi.com>
References: <20220821141622 DOT A5836824697A AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <63288ff-b013-eb67-cf40-56d6119e8cfa AT grinsen-ohne-katze DOT de> <20220824165958 DOT C92CB80724AC AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <d8b9a31-c7e7-bc6-c719-6ed8a2a0eb1e AT grinsen-ohne-katze DOT de> <B235A836-B344-47B2-A98D-9FDEA3674EB5 AT noqsi DOT com>
Comments: In-reply-to John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
   message dated "Thu, 25 Aug 2022 13:29:06 -0400."
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Message-Id: <20220825184206.2D9ED80724AA@turkos.aspodata.se>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 20:42:06 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

John:
> > On Aug 25, 2022, at 12:09 PM, Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org> wrote:
> > 
> > b) defining the pinnumber for use with SPICE backends.
> > 
> > IMHO, b) should be renamed to "spice:pinseq=",
...
> gnet-spice-noqsi (https://github.com/noqsi/gnet-spice-noqsi)
> uses its much more flexible spice-prototype attribute for that.

Which is ?

In https://github.com/noqsi/gnet-spice-noqsi/wiki/Reference
you have attr@ so you can transfer any geda/lepton attribute
to the spice world, Is that what you mean ?

I'd say if you use the backend name as a prefix or something,
like nosqi:model-name=nbjt or nosqi=model-name=nbjt it would
clear that that part goes to nosqi and nowhere else, wouldn't
that be a good thing ?

So, at least on the surface, Rolands suggestion seems good.

///

The page above says:
 "See http://gpleda.org/ for details on Lepton and lepton-netlist."
maybe you should change that to the lepton site.

Regards,
/Karl Hammar