X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 14:13:45 +0100
From: "Chris Green (cl AT isbd DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: "Chris Green (cl AT isbd DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: [geda-user] Re: Easiest way to convert or print .sch files from gschem?
Message-ID: <YlrBCU1wXtK++mQ2@esprimo>
Mail-Followup-To: "Chris Green (cl AT isbd DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
References: <Ylqo2zEYYg2My/uP AT esprimo>
 <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 22 DOT 394 DOT 2204161444150 DOT 8376 AT yoga>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2204161444150.8376@yoga>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 02:50:24PM +0200, Roland Lutz wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2022, Chris Green (cl AT isbd DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]
> wrote:
> > I have some .sch files I'd like to look at and/or print, I no longer
> > have geda installed.  Is there a quick/easy way to view the files
> > without re-installing geda?
> > 
> > Can I just install gschem maybe?
> 
> You don't have to install gEDA/gaf at all in order to use it.  After running
> "make", just run the commands you need from the build directory (e.g.,
> "gschem/src/gschem").
> 
> You could also install gschem (or gaf for command-line processing) alone,
> but figuring out which files it needs to be installed (like, the default
> symbol library) and which it doesn't could be a problem.  It's easier to
> just run everything from the build directory.
> 
Geda is no longer available in Ubuntu.

Are you saying I could download the source files and build and then
just run gschem from the build dirctory?  I can do that I guess if
there's no easier way.

-- 
Chris Green