X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=rahul.net; s=202010; t=1636666529; bh=X0WSaiQuQfaIo+j1OqS6URbRhwY2xR4tqgkUmKM9mek=; h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Reply-To:From:From; b=f5cwZyOBl5ksZppPhZCQA978wPCmWJ7PL2YLZ4+6X1jtKFn9VfzAKIXqe5Q8QfMFJ XlVgl75folMU07G1oI7AaU49PGjfUzrUNFxOjdz509J84xJb9VPsBjDlW71splngCE ZpU2+lANYxaYnSSye2d97jn/8NSf7Nz6rspGLhbiNgZn4EvFRb/COg5UY/39R2dnlQ OWhaJVFr06hCDuw9evV4xX529INlASuf3A/FxyUKHxIMbEdx6Be98PU7Z9e0L4IwZI KhJbgFsoxcg75EeaXJmeMXcgDQbYiSv29fXUfpEWmc2IXxTYV5RllcEy6SztRj5v4F zkQxdC32Pd8dA== Message-ID: <20211111213528.31921.qmail@rahul.net> Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 13:35:28 -0800 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] Removing solder mask from pads? In-Reply-To: <46723ae1-9651-cb1a-99c3-2c859eebeb5e@gmx.de> References: <20211110060918 DOT 23412 DOT qmail AT rahul DOT net> <46723ae1-9651-cb1a-99c3-2c859eebeb5e AT gmx DOT de> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 26.1 From: "conover AT rahul DOT net (John Conover) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.08 / 10.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[conover AT rahul DOT net]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM(-0.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7922, ipnet:67.160.0.0/11, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-2.98)[99.90%] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6AAF2BBCC6 X-Rspamd-Server: aqua-new.rahul.net Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Thanks! Works like a charm. John FF 246 (ff246 AT gmx DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] writes: > Am 10.11.21 um 07:09 schrieb conover AT rahul DOT net (John Conover) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]: > > > > How do you remove the solder mask from the footprint of the following > > two layer SMA edge connector? > > > > Element["" "" "" "" 423.04mil 281.42mil 0 0 0 100 ""] > > ( > > Pad[-152.52mil 80.71mil -152.52mil -80.71mil 120.00mil 20 3 "1" "1" "onsolder,square"] > > Pad[0.00mil 80.71mil 0.00mil -80.71mil 120.00mil 20 3 "2" "2" "onsolder,square"] > > Pad[152.52mil 80.71mil 152.52mil -80.71mil 120.00mil 20 3 "3" "3" "onsolder,square"] > > Pad[-152.52mil 80.71mil -152.52mil -80.71mil 120.00mil 20 3 "1" "1" "square"] > > Pad[0.00mil 80.71mil 0.00mil -80.71mil 120.00mil 20 3 "2" "2" "square"] > > Pad[152.52mil 80.71mil 152.52mil -80.71mil 120.00mil 20 3 "3" "3" "square"] > > ) > > > > Thanks, > > > > John > > > > > > The following should resolve the issue: > > Element["" "" "" "" 423.04mil 281.42mil 0 0 0 100 ""] > ( > Pad[-152.52mil 80.71mil -152.52mil -80.71mil 120.00mil 20 130mil "1" "1" "onsolder,square"] > Pad[0.00mil 80.71mil 0.00mil -80.71mil 120.00mil 20 130mil "2" "2" "onsolder,square"] > Pad[152.52mil 80.71mil 152.52mil -80.71mil 120.00mil 20 130mil "3" "3" "onsolder,square"] > Pad[-152.52mil 80.71mil -152.52mil -80.71mil 120.00mil 20 130mil "1" "1" "square"] > Pad[0.00mil 80.71mil 0.00mil -80.71mil 120.00mil 20 130mil "2" "2" "square"] > Pad[152.52mil 80.71mil 152.52mil -80.71mil 120.00mil 20 130mil "3" "3" "square"] > ) > > > The seventh value inside of Pad[ ] is defining the shorter side of a rectangle around the pad, which has no solder mask inside. In your case it was 3. Without a unit, 3 would result in 0.03mil, so pretty small. You could change the value to something like 130mil and the pad will be free of solder mask (for reference: the pad width is 120mil). You should also probably change the clearance around the pad, it's currently 20 so 0.2mil, however you'd only need to do this if you have a copper filled area on one of either the top or bottom layer (only used for that). However the clearance value is not the sidelength of a rectangle, it's the space on each side combined. > > If you need more information on what each value does, feel free to ask. > > I hope this helped. -- John Conover, conover AT rahul DOT net, http://www.johncon.com/