X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=rahul.net; s=202010;
	t=1636648749; bh=mPUYAEOQ3We9ZJNA7IHaE1r2ljuWfYUJMRe+o5k3lOE=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:Reply-To:From:From;
	b=hn2jWQkCyjdkM6dPVKEtc7htYyVdb2yGlzmOOXocM2c5csXIFx8GgIwjDILAaUcQO
	 i441JngCLaUO2I/urQVDSw5vUdt7SAmYkXUwe8k3NqlfzNCWVw8Tjxta/kpNv4kcw6
	 dqTAIDcjSQ/+vFiiMbGSdjohHUAGq+muBYmm0JGA/lJFDFU/6C6rPVTSDx6BHgRqUh
	 cwL3Ck2q6rh6AYtG/W3/jTALowuPsaeXSQ5CqB6V6kmnv6rgrDPWBJEh1XUZ5M+3J+
	 qU4IweP2kuW4PgGvjENcVBPKyVKt1abreRuWuSB84EWzkZr6Oq3LPHJdqFvzAqVg7g
	 LvAxGJQQK+Rjw==
Message-ID: <20211111163908.16668.qmail@rahul.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 08:39:08 -0800
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: [geda-user] pcb-rnd vs pcb?
X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 26.1
From: "conover AT rahul DOT net (John Conover) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.10 / 10.00];
	 ARC_NA(0.00)[];
	 HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[conover AT rahul DOT net];
	 REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[];
	 TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
	 MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
	 TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[];
	 RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1];
	 FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[];
	 NEURAL_HAM(-0.00)[-1.000];
	 RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0];
	 FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
	 MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
	 SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[];
	 ASN(0.00)[asn:7922, ipnet:67.160.0.0/11, country:US];
	 MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[];
	 BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 82D2EBB934
X-Rspamd-Server: aqua-new.rahul.net
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Is there a way to use the auto router from pcb in pcb-rnd?

pcb-rnd's auto router seems inferior to pcb's.

I tried routing 44 legacy designs done with pcb, (with pcb-rnd,) and
none routed to completion.

    Thanks,

    John
    
-- 

John Conover, conover AT rahul DOT net, http://www.johncon.com/