X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=XJycCyCRRgaed++67EwPxqx7H7UMal1DmApVJFp7ljY=; b=SyRUERIzgaJBXDExaZL3knO5Eb+E8lGPPlyTitsFjNDLsCTB7NosLsVg3Zro4pinD5 cNBwCESsD41oO6pVndLoPBGlQXrIb4qz7kPnAf2AhQ6T3u8gr8xjzGhTNCR0aKCASYAz ZjRacsyKnI5dpVqbmU/iTka6rVovU8H/vHvUl6ACwnp9c3QV1LQi5H0i//xtBzbhOi5e EBok1/qNYchChzyvUpkU1FsZpPUowP5CZCihLgtgUEevdE3d8QvfRvEwVst0TZtKxDDn RhFlJNwnz61U/dSRn8iig57ExZBDMKYP+bCKa3gHEasVKKDBeoVi1S6LVFfeQHlXkowI 81sA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=XJycCyCRRgaed++67EwPxqx7H7UMal1DmApVJFp7ljY=; b=oXP181IhAtKrwEvHxqC0CQSMKUXIvOSdcPYszEaZi9lH9WkPp2Iadz3Vw2708IvWj+ 7z3YqyfLklodUznbJGWxKhWkzxBBw2Zf2sOH4xVfPnVdpM2/d/TSk2Gnt1cQ0Wp/OpAK unjmJ7XpENyFwbGubACDBreuO4lFka4WUsVHdZD4oZQXw5HWDhg4PAhr5kvP97+9etH3 I6K4a6VLvNUgSuKJ+wNhEHOVKzun6m6KHEMDYAgLvXVFs0psc1/DdWqg/QVj1OwAJtar 6S6Asw1ldQ9NxwDSHsdwXLHdUt9sBkzsYqICZaLum4LeVdc2Ur6714LHb+W7xeABVfq4 y/TQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532MPpDS1NM27ti3avxwMJt/zim3Sbudl0EaKIP8G85ipdSfzvUa LQ8VX3qdrmIa3OlqpXetukfmMXCM5oI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyjRT9n5HV34toj7Z//plxyCMtfdRUNi0aoy00Rd5YILQOjY93W7zofeQbzhDhzC0Vm5hglgQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4314:: with SMTP id l20mr3940266lfh.266.1626359891026; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 07:38:11 -0700 (PDT) From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" X-Google-Original-From: Vladimir Zhbanov Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 17:38:09 +0300 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] file format cooperation Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <9f6960b4-e3e7-7a99-7617-77e51e6bee4c AT xs4all DOT nl> <20210714104650 DOT 7F50483DB04D AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20210715130942 DOT A15C683D443A AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210715130942.A15C683D443A@turkos.aspodata.se> Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Karl, On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 03:09:42PM +0200, karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: ... > > > What I urge for is that semantics be the same and continuously agreed on > > > by both groups. > > > > I'm still not sure what you're asking about. Pediwikia reads many > > general words about this topic word in different contexts, mostly > > without useful examples. > > > > What's the `semantics' word does mean practically to you, in > > person, in the gEDA context? Could you elaborate a bit more on > > this? Just schematic/symbol attributes and their interpretation > > in netlists? Or something more? > ... > > >From the tip of my head: > > gEDA: portname as an alternative to refdes in hierarchical sch's > lepton: in H lines, interpretation of line width 0, join styles dep. on > cap styles, "port" symbols with net attr. Then all this is doable without creating a new committee/sites/EDA infrastructure. Just file a bug report on a particular case or, better, make a PR :-) > I know that in lepton, all of thoose due to my request. > Shall I construct test cases ? Please do. I'll push them to our issue tracker then. -- Vladimir