X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.7+dev X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: inbox From: "karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] file format cooperation In-reply-to: References: <9f6960b4-e3e7-7a99-7617-77e51e6bee4c AT xs4all DOT nl> <20210714104650 DOT 7F50483DB04D AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> Comments: In-reply-to "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" message dated "Thu, 15 Jul 2021 10:42:32 +0300." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20210715130942.A15C683D443A@turkos.aspodata.se> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 15:09:42 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Vladimir: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 12:46:50PM +0200, karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: ... > > What I urge for is that semantics be the same and continuously agreed on > > by both groups. > > I'm still not sure what you're asking about. Pediwikia reads many > general words about this topic word in different contexts, mostly > without useful examples. > > What's the `semantics' word does mean practically to you, in > person, in the gEDA context? Could you elaborate a bit more on > this? Just schematic/symbol attributes and their interpretation > in netlists? Or something more? ... From the tip of my head: gEDA: portname as an alternative to refdes in hierarchical sch's lepton: in H lines, interpretation of line width 0, join styles dep. on cap styles, "port" symbols with net attr. I know that in lepton, all of thoose due to my request. Shall I construct test cases ? Regards, /Karl Hammar