X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <20210712205217.13208.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 20:52:17 +0000
From: "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: gEDA users mailing list <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: [geda-user] Re: xorn details, perhaps
References: <A054EE4E-3819-42C7-9B56-B3644AD8AC39 AT noqsi DOT com>
 <YOf62YVLNddlPKR7 AT lepton>
 <20210712180102 DOT 5944 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
 <CAM2RGhSPHcRRGuAHEaaD1o325e65W9NDBBJ6TLqBJo6zmw5-PQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAM2RGhSPHcRRGuAHEaaD1o325e65W9NDBBJ6TLqBJo6zmw5-PQ@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> Really guys. We all went our separate forks to avoid this sort of thing.

Don't be tricked by the previous subject and please don't misunderstand: I'm
not trying to change anyone's mind and I'm certainly not trying to change
lepton. I'm happy that it's available to John and others who prefer Scheme.

I've merely described that, and why, I find xorn and Python good choices.

I'd find it interesting to further discuss xorn in depth, especially
given John's experience.


Kind regards

//Peter