X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at smtp-vp02.sig.oregonstate.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.7\)) Subject: Re: [geda-user] Rendering bugs with gschem From: "Roger Traylor (traylor AT engr DOT orst DOT edu) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" X-Priority: 3 In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2021 11:54:05 -0700 Message-Id: References: To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id 164IsBpG027489 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Claudio, Upgraded to gEDA/gschem version 1.10.2.20201216 Both screen and printed images are correct now. Roger Traylor > On Jul 4, 2021, at 6:22 AM, Claudio Fabri (clafi AT gmx DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > Hi. Again. > > I have gschem version 1.10.0 (g1919a45), i.e. not the latest, and I experienced a few bugs, not very annoying though. Here they are: > > * There are rendering issues with PDF prints of my schematics, i.e. some texts are pushed down by a relatively large offset, as illustrated there: https://imgur.com/a/M8FE0ZE. > > * The rendering of active-low symbols is rendered in gschem with a line so thick the text disappears... unless the zoom level is increased to a very large value, as illustrated there: https://imgur.com/a/PhpyD6s. > > * The left of the status bar seems to have overlapping GUI controls, not clear what they do but there are at least two buttons, as illustrated there: https://imgur.com/y8PWH8P.png > > May I safely assume all these bugs are fixed in the latest version from GIT or are there any that would need to be reported? > > I'm asking because the Linux distribution I'm using (Manjaro) has not yet packaged the latest version of gschem and I might have to compile it manually, which I only want to do extremely carefully on that platform so I prefer asking first to be sure, hoping the question makes sense. > > Thanks a lot in advance. > > Claudio F.