X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.7+dev
X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl
X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: inbox
From: "karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] lepton-schematic configuration
In-reply-to: <YH4DHdqSfzbxpFuc@lepton>
References: <f8c52456-df0a-0d5e-968a-f46aecdea612 AT wavecable DOT com> <YGKiL+QJHhcTyttA AT lepton> <17a2b20c-5100-7084-b3e5-da83b4c7cc31 AT wavecable DOT com> <20210416171019 DOT AB0F783D2748 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <45fc224d-86ac-d9e7-e0c0-045f88ff3c39 AT wavecable DOT com> <YHqB1sLeFXFjw2CW AT lepton> <20210417120802 DOT AC8E5824EA9F AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <YHrhqCfn5pnbjHmp AT lepton> <20210417150846 DOT D71A7824EAA0 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <YH4DHdqSfzbxpFuc AT lepton>
Comments: In-reply-to "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
   message dated "Tue, 20 Apr 2021 01:24:29 +0300."
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <20210420004030.ADA0580770A5@turkos.aspodata.se>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 02:40:30 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Vladimir:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 05:08:46PM +0200, karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
...
> > > It's a shame that geda moved other way around having all means
> > > and whose interpreter just _reads_ sexps natively.)
...
> > Wasn't that about not risking evildoing commands in files inported
> > from elsewhere.
...
> > If we had that, the rationale for the ini files wouldn't hold any
> > more.
...
> Do you mean something like this?
> 
>   https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Sandboxed-Evaluation.html

Yes, perhaps.

> Well, there are simpler ways.  For example, we could just use a
> declarative style of config in Scheme instead of executable
> rc commands like Guix does.

Well, if that work, why not, would probably solve the problem you have
had with ini-files.

Regards,
/Karl Hammar