X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <20201221004804.5809.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:48:04 +0000
From: "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: "Girvin Herr \(gherrl AT fastmail DOT com\) \[via geda-user AT delorie DOT com\]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Problem with Guile 2.2.4 dependency for gEDA 1.10.1.
References: <f5ab1b6f-dbf3-4be3-a43f-eb74b32b7a51 AT fastmail DOT com>
 <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2012190043450 DOT 7556 AT nimbus>
 <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2012191400380 DOT 24569 AT nimbus>
 <7cd2efb5-177d-05b9-ecd7-433750537790 AT fastmail DOT com>
 <20201221003057 DOT 08aca882 AT swips DOT iqo DOT uni-hannover DOT de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20201221003057.08aca882@swips.iqo.uni-hannover.de>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> (I am working on getting geda back in. But don't bet your house on it)

Thanks for that. This is of course unfortunate. The 1.10.1 version
should then be fine for debian to take, right?

Is Bdale still around? He (is|was) a debian developer.


//Peter