X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-TCPREMOTEIP: 100.0.183.69 X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com From: John Doty Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_432E86F9-95AE-4781-B0B5-1155B1DBB497" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\)) Subject: Re: [geda-user] SAB processing patches Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:35:53 -0500 References: <20201130220505 DOT 0AE4282C54FD AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <7c75ed03-456c-b408-8b50-0448f6b3a04f AT epilitimus DOT com> <1b2c64b3-6a36-c1f3-dd54-bb583c6bea17 AT epilitimus DOT com> <475f980e-fddd-60d1-9a02-a5bc5fb5805b AT epilitimus DOT com>

<25887669-D8C1-48B8-BEE7-13EEBFC4D006 AT noqsi DOT com> <7f074abb-e7ae-275c-ee49-d06fc7f2a706 AT epilitimus DOT com>

<836e84ad-aa1d-fa56-5996-7445d92e94db AT epilitimus DOT com> To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com In-Reply-To: <836e84ad-aa1d-fa56-5996-7445d92e94db@epilitimus.com> Message-Id: <1BBAE111-8895-4DD9-A10C-EB35019A6D93@noqsi.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --Apple-Mail=_432E86F9-95AE-4781-B0B5-1155B1DBB497 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > On Dec 10, 2020, at 3:23 PM, Glenn (glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com) [via = geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >=20 >> Then you add the appropriate annotations and support files for *that* >> approach, and use an appropriate netlister. spice-noqsi lets you draw >> what you=E2=80=99re intending to build and annotate it for simulation = in >> SPICE. There=E2=80=99s no reason you can=E2=80=99t have annotations = for other >> simulators if you have a back end that understands them. >>=20 > Or you can make them once in a backend independent manner. Sounds like some of the early gEDA mistakes, like the overloading of = pinseq. How is anything but a SPICE flow going to make sense of a = spice-prototype? John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. jpd AT noqsi DOT com --Apple-Mail=_432E86F9-95AE-4781-B0B5-1155B1DBB497 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8

On Dec 10, 2020, at 3:23 PM, Glenn (glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

Then = you add the appropriate annotations and support files for *that*
approach, and use an appropriate netlister. spice-noqsi lets = you draw
what you=E2=80=99re intending to build and = annotate it for simulation in
SPICE. There=E2=80=99s no = reason you can=E2=80=99t have annotations for other
simulators if you have a back end that understands them.

Or you can make them once in a backend independent = manner.

Sounds = like some of the early gEDA mistakes, like the overloading of pinseq. = How is anything but a SPICE flow going to make sense of a = spice-prototype?

John Doty = Noqsi = Aerospace, Ltd.

jpd AT noqsi DOT com

= --Apple-Mail=_432E86F9-95AE-4781-B0B5-1155B1DBB497--