X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] automatically create a .sch file containing a single component? To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: From: "Branko (brankob AT s5tehnika DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Message-ID: <4b58fa2e-e7cd-a682-3887-aa8ad848e8f4@s5tehnika.net> Disposition-Notification-To: Branko Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 23:18:19 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: sl Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk BTW, wouldn't it be easier to directly scan and check sch and pcb symbols with script ? On 3. 12. 20 20:12, Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > The part that's pointlessly interactive is the creation of the .sch > file. I have to have gschem launched and manually add the symbol. > > I'd like to do one of these instead: > > * create an sch containing just the sch using some batch mode op > > * just create the sch by script. but I don't get why some text > elements (refdes=, device=) end up > repeated in the .sch file and other stay in the element. what > distinguishes these elements? > > * create the pcb file directly. sort of a hassle but probably what > I'll do unless there's a better way, > a little weird in my case since I have a lot of footprints using a > text library of my own